FERMI QUADRAT PRAIRIE STUDY 2006
Back
to Honors Biology Student List of Pages
|
|
GPS LOCATION: N:__________ W:___________
STUDENT RESEARCHER: ____Charle H.__
| Comparative
Analysis |
fermi 06 graph |
importance value |
| Fermi
05 graph |
dominance |
DATA:
| By IMPORTANCE VALUE | by Dominance | ||||
| Big Bluestem | 70.41 | Big Bluestem | 4.38 | ||
| Indian Grass | 37.3 | Wild Bergamot | 4.23 | ||
| Wild Bergamot | 27.86 | Stiff Goldenrod | 3.79 | ||
| Prairie Cord Grass | 25.35 | Indian Grass | 3.06 | ||
| Stiff Goldenrod | 19.83 | Prairie Cord Grass | 3 | ||
| Rosinweed | 19.12 | Yellow Coneflower | 2.91 | ||
| Yellow Coneflower | 17.39 | Compass Plant | 2.87 | ||
| Compass Plant | 16.95 | Rosinweed | 2.83 | ||
| Tall Coreopsis | 14.74 | Tall Coreopsis | 2.08 | ||
| Mountain Mint | 10.54 | Foxglove Beard Tongue | 1.66 | ||
| Foxglove Beard Tongue | 9.37 | Mountain Mint | 1.57 | ||
| Prairie Dock | 8.32 | Switch Grass | 0.76 | ||
| Switch Grass | 5.92 | Sawtooth Sunflower | 0.68 | ||
| Sawtooth Sunflower | 5.55 | Prairie Dock | 0.64 | ||
| New England Aster | 2.74 | Rattlesnake Master | 0.3 | ||
| Black-eyed Susan | 2.72 | Wild Quinine | 0.23 | ||
| Rattlesnake Master | 1.59 | New England Aster | 0.21 | ||
| Wild Quinine | 1.37 | Black-eyed Susan | 0.19 | ||
| Tall Boneset | 1.15 | Tall Boneset | 0.13 | ||
| White Wild Indigo | 1.02 | White Wild Indigo | 0.11 | ||
| Dense Blazing Star | 0.76 | Dense Blazing Star | 0.02 |
| ALL Species | Dominance | Importance Value | ALL Species by Dominance | Dominance | ALL Species by IV | Importance Value | ||
| Big Bluestem | 31.2 | 154.73 | Big Bluestem | 31.2 | Big Bluestem | 154.73 | ||
| Stiff Goldenrod | 0.8 | 6.73 | Sweet Clovers (tall) | 18 | Unlisted-Grasslike | 129.91 | ||
| Compass Plant | 7.4 | 24.45 | Unlisted-Grasslike | 12.4 | Sweet Clovers (tall) | 122.84 | ||
| Switch Grass | 1.8 | 7.89 | Compass Plant | 7.4 | Compass Plant | 24.45 | ||
| Prairie Dock | 5.6 | 14.18 | White Prairie Clover | 6 | Hairy Aster | 23.33 | ||
| Rosinweed | 0.2 | 5.22 | Prairie Dock | 5.6 | White Prairie Clover | 21.95 | ||
| Yellow Coneflower | 0.2 | 5.22 | Wild Bergamot | 3.2 | New England Aster | 18.43 | ||
| Tall Coreopsis | 0.6 | 6.41 | Sawtooth Sunflower | 3 | Wild Bergamot | 16.82 | ||
| Sawtooth Sunflower | 3 | 10.07 | New England Aster | 2 | Prairie Dock | 14.18 | ||
| Wild Bergamot | 3.2 | 16.82 | Switch Grass | 1.8 | Dandelion | 14.08 | ||
| Mountain Mint | 1.2 | 7.92 | Hairy Aster | 1.4 | Sawtooth Sunflower | 10.07 | ||
| New England Aster | 2 | 18.43 | Mountain Mint | 1.2 | Tall goldenrod | 9.85 | ||
| White Prairie Clover | 6 | 21.95 | Dandelion | 1 | Mountain Mint | 7.92 | ||
| Sweet Clovers (tall) | 18 | 122.84 | Stiff Goldenrod | 0.8 | Switch Grass | 7.89 | ||
| Tall goldenrod | 0.2 | 9.85 | Tall Coreopsis | 0.6 | Stiff Goldenrod | 6.73 | ||
| Hairy Aster | 1.4 | 23.33 | Rosinweed | 0.2 | Tall Coreopsis | 6.41 | ||
| Dandelion | 1 | 14.08 | Yellow Coneflower | 0.2 | Rosinweed | 5.22 | ||
| Unlisted-Grasslike | 12.4 | 129.91 | Tall goldenrod | 0.2 | Yellow Coneflower | 5.22 |
GRAPHS OF DOMINANCE AND IMPORTANCE VALUE:





3 major components used to compare different prairie plots.
Importance value
The dominance value
Diversity
Importance value is the sum of relative dominance, relative
dominance, relative frequency, and relative density.
Dominance is used to tell which plants are taking up the most
room and are the most dominant.
It is figured out by taking the total percent coverage of
species and dividing it by the total area.
Diversity is the total number of plants of a certain species
divided by the total area sampled. Diversity is important because the more
diversity there, the better the environment will be.
Comparison
The
information that we gathered is a little different from the data at Fermi Lab.
From the year of 2005 to the year of 2006 there is a lot of different data. In
2005 there were certain plants and weeds that had bigger numbers of species than
in 2006. In 2006 there was a change
in species and their amounts. Some
of the plants that changed and got added to the 2006 data were the Compass
Plant, White Prairie Clovers, New England Aster, Prairie Dock, and Sawtooth
Grass.
Prediction
I
predict that in ten years the species of plants will change again.
The Big Bluestem will most likely still be in the top ten but other
plants like the Stiff Goldenrod and Sawtooth flower.
I also predict that the amount of species will be a lot higher because
they would have had more time to grow. A
prime example would be the Big Bluestem because between 2005 and 2006 the amount
more than doubled itself. Another thing I think their will be a lot more Sweet
clovers(tall) because I think weeds grow a lot faster than plants and in larger
amounts.
Reflection
I learned and gained a lot of knowledge about the prairie after doing this project. When we first started learning about prairies I didn’t know their was a difference between a prairie and a field, I thought they were the same thing with different names. I found out a lot of different things after visiting the prairie. Plants and weeds I didn’t even know existed. That was the best part about of the whole field trip, finding new and interesting plants. Over all, I had a great time at the prairie, and would love to go back.
COPYRIGHT:
© Copyright 2006, L&T Natural Images and Madison Jr. High, all rights reserved. Contact information: email at lccwik@comcast.net or tcoutts@naperville203.org
ACKNOWLEDGMENT:
This project was created by the Honors Biology ll students of Seton
Academy in South Holland, Illinois with the help of their teacher Mr. Cwik.
Support for the project came from Principal Ms. Ingia Jackson and the
other dedicated and cooperative faculty and staff of Seton Academy.
REFERENCES:
Fermilab Education Department particularly the SIMply Prairie Project.
Authors: Bill Fraccaro, formerly of Johnson School, Wheaton, IL; Lawrence Cwik,
Seton Academy and Pat Franzen, formerly Madison Jr. High Naperville, IL; and Bernie Jokiel,
formerly from Gary D, Jewel Middle School, North Aurora, IL.
Created for the NTEP II Fermilab LInC program sponsored by Fermi
National Accelerator Laboratory Education Office and Friends of
Fermilab, and funded by United States Department of Energy, Illinois
State Board of Education, North Central Regional Technology in
Education Consortium which is operated by North Central Regional
Educational Laboratory (NCREL), and the National Science Foundation.