FERMI QUADRAT PRAIRIE STUDY 2006

Back to Period 9 Student List

Left to Right: Bridget, Cayla, Brandon, Matt

GPS LOCATION: N:_41° 50'28.1"      W:_88° 16'26.9"

STUDENT RESEARCHER: Cayla B.

 

 

Aerial View of Fermi Prairie Quadrats Plot 17

 

 

Geographic Map of Fermi Prairie Quadrats Plot 17

top Data Table Graphs Comparative Analysis


(INSERT YOUR LINKS IN THE LINKS TABLE BELOW. DELETE THIS WHEN DONE.)




















 

DATA:

                                                               

 

 

Plant names Total Percentage Dominince Importance Value Total # of plants found
Indian grass 0.05 0.05 24.58 3
Rosinweed 10 10 84.6 14
Wild Bergamot 15 15 176.66 30
Drummonds Aster 10 10 76.6 12
Hairy Vetch 2 2 39.72 6
Crab Grass 20 20 164.72 30
Mystery plant 0.02 0.02 16.5322 1
Yellow Coneflower 5 5 48.55 7

 

 

Table of All Quadrats of Plot 17

RAW DATA
Native Plants Total Plants Found Total Percentage Found # of Quadrats Found In Density Frequency Dominance Relative Density Relative Frequency Relative Dominance Importance Value
Big Bluestem 200 423 11 16.67 0.92 35.25 40.57 27.5 48.62 116.69
Compass Plant 12 30 1 1 0.08 2.5 2.43 2.5 3.45 8.38
Indian Grass 126 222 8 10.5 0.67 18.5 25.56 20 25.52 71.08
Switch Grass 34 38 2 2.83 0.17 3.17 6.9 5 4.37 16.27
Prairie Dock 7 44 3 0.58 0.25 3.67 1.42 7.5 5.06 13.98
Rosinweed 6 5 3 0.5 0.25 0.42 1.22 7.5 0.57 9.29
Yellow Coneflower 5 4 2 0.42 0.17 0.33 1.01 5 0.46 6.47
Wild Bergamot 91 80 4 7.58 0.33 6.67 18.46 10 9.2 37.65
New England Aster 1 15 1 0.08 0.08 1.25 0.2 2.5 1.72 4.43
Tall Boneset 8 7 3 0.67 0.25 0.58 1.62 7.5 0.81 9.93
Foxglove Beard Tongue 1 1 1 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.2 2.5 0.12 2.82
Indian Hemp 2 1 1 0.17 0.08 0.08 0.41 2.5 0.12 3.02
Non-Native (Weed) Plants Total Plants Found Total Percentage Found # of Quadrats Found In Density Frequency Dominance Relative Density Relative Frequency Relative Dominance Importance Value
Daisy Fleabane 1 1 1 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.02 3.03 0.16 3.21
Wild Carrot 86 18 3 7.17 0.25 1.5 2.02 9.09 2.85 13.96
Sweet Clovers (tall) 168 140 5 14 0.42 11.67 3.95 15.15 22.15 41.26
Yarrow 18 27 4 1.5 0.33 2.25 0.42 12.12 4.27 16.82
Tall goldenrod 25 16 4 2.08 0.33 1.33 0.59 12.12 2.53 15.24
Clovers (ground) 2 10 1 0.17 0.08 0.83 0.05 3.03 1.58 4.66
Hairy Vetch 3 17 2 0.25 0.17 1.42 0.07 6.06 2.69 8.82
Drummonds Aster 6 4 1 0.5 0.08 0.33 0.14 3.03 0.63 3.8
Unlisted-Oval leaf 111 154 4 9.25 0.33 12.83 2.61 12.12 24.37 39.1
Unlisted-Grasslike 3831 245 8 319.25 0.67 20.42 90.12 24.24 38.77 153.13
SORTED DATA BELOW
Native Plants by Dominance Dominance   Native Plants by I.V Importance Value              
Big Bluestem 35.25 Big Bluestem 116.69
Indian Grass 18.5 Indian Grass 71.08
Wild Bergamot 6.67 Wild Bergamot 37.65
Prairie Dock 3.67 Switch Grass 16.27
Switch Grass 3.17 Prairie Dock 13.98
Compass Plant 2.5 Tall Boneset 9.93
New England Aster 1.25 Rosinweed 9.29
Tall Boneset 0.58 Compass Plant 8.38
Rosinweed 0.42 Yellow Coneflower 6.47
Yellow Coneflower 0.33 New England Aster 4.43
Foxglove Beard Tongue 0.08 Indian Hemp 3.02
Indian Hemp 0.08 Foxglove Beard Tongue 2.82
Non-Native (Weed) Plants by Dominance Dominance   Non-Native (Weed) Plants by I.V. Importance Value              
Unlisted-Grasslike 20.42 Unlisted-Grasslike 153.13
Unlisted-Oval leaf 12.83 Sweet Clovers (tall) 41.26
Sweet Clovers (tall) 11.67 Unlisted-Oval leaf 39.1
Yarrow 2.25 Yarrow 16.82
Wild Carrot 1.5 Tall goldenrod 15.24
Hairy Vetch 1.42 Wild Carrot 13.96
Tall goldenrod 1.33 Hairy Vetch 8.82
Clovers (ground) 0.83 Clovers (ground) 4.66
Drummonds Aster 0.33 Drummonds Aster 3.8
Daisy Fleabane 0.08 Daisy Fleabane 3.21
ALL SPECIES Dominance Importance Value ALL SPECIES Dominance   ALL SPECIES Importance Value      
Big Bluestem 35.25 116.69 Big Bluestem 35.25 Unlisted-Grasslike 153.13
Compass Plant 2.5 8.38 Unlisted-Grasslike 20.42 Big Bluestem 116.69
Indian Grass 18.5 71.08 Indian Grass 18.5 Indian Grass 71.08
Switch Grass 3.17 16.27 Unlisted-Oval leaf 12.83 Sweet Clovers (tall) 41.26
Prairie Dock 3.67 13.98 Sweet Clovers (tall) 11.67 Unlisted-Oval leaf 39.1
Rosinweed 0.42 9.29 Wild Bergamot 6.67 Wild Bergamot 37.65
Yellow Coneflower 0.33 6.47 Prairie Dock 3.67 Yarrow 16.82
Wild Bergamot 6.67 37.65 Switch Grass 3.17 Switch Grass 16.27
New England Aster 1.25 4.43 Compass Plant 2.5 Tall goldenrod 15.24
Tall Boneset 0.58 9.93 Yarrow 2.25 Prairie Dock 13.98
Foxglove Beard Tongue 0.08 2.82 Wild Carrot 1.5 Wild Carrot 13.96
Indian Hemp 0.08 3.02 Hairy Vetch 1.42 Tall Boneset 9.93
Daisy Fleabane 0.08 3.21 Tall goldenrod 1.33 Rosinweed 9.29
Wild Carrot 1.5 13.96 New England Aster 1.25 Hairy Vetch 8.82
Sweet Clovers (tall) 11.67 41.26 Clovers (ground) 0.83 Compass Plant 8.38
Yarrow 2.25 16.82 Tall Boneset 0.58 Yellow Coneflower 6.47
Tall goldenrod 1.33 15.24 Rosinweed 0.42 Clovers (ground) 4.66
Clovers (ground) 0.83 4.66 Yellow Coneflower 0.33 New England Aster 4.43
Hairy Vetch 1.42 8.82 Drummonds Aster 0.33 Drummonds Aster 3.8
Drummonds Aster 0.33 3.8 Foxglove Beard Tongue 0.08 Daisy Fleabane 3.21
Unlisted-Oval leaf 12.83 39.1 Indian Hemp 0.08 Indian Hemp 3.02
Unlisted-Grasslike 20.42 153.13 Daisy Fleabane 0.08 Foxglove Beard Tongue 2.82

 

 

 

 


 

GRAPHS OF DOMINANCE AND IMPORTANCE VALUE:

Graphs of Dominance and Importance Values for all Quadrats 2006

 

 


COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS:

-Part One-

Our class went to Fermi this year, for 2006. Fermi used to be 100% bare earth & non-native grass. It was a weed field.

            There in Fermi, we used quadrats to find out our information. A quadrat is thought of as a picture, during a certain time, in a certain year. To find out our information, we used importance value, dominance, and biological diversity. You are probably wondering, what in the world is importance value, dominance, and biological diversity? Well you are in luck, because here is where you’ll learn how they fit in and what they are, here in Fermi, the land of prairie.

            First, we need to have importance value, dominance, and biological diversity to see how Fermi is doing, health wise. We also use it to compare. Let’s start first with, importance value. Importance value tells us how dominant, how frequent, and how dense a plant is in the ecosystem. To get your importance value, you add relative dominance, plus relative frequency, plus relative density. The higher the importance value, the healthier it is.

            We also need dominance to see how Fermi’s plants are. Dominance is, the total percent cover of species, in other words, the amount of space that is taken, up by the plants. When we use dominance to compare, you want to make sure it is going up. To find your dominance, you count the total amount of plant species there was. Each year we compare how well the plants are doing.

            Another method that we use to get our data and our comparison is biological diversity. Now that sounds like it uses a lot of brain power! Not really. As long as you know how to count, then you will ace this. Biological diversity is many different kinds of living things that live together in the same area. More diversity of life in an environment, the better the environment is. The counting comes in with estimation at how much there is too. You have to compare to other years past data and see if it is healthier.

            Biological diversity, importance value, and dominance, is all very important. We can compare with it and learn more things about Fermi and other different places in the world.

                                                                                   -Part 2-

Fermi’s plants have really changed over the years.

    For our quadrat, we only had 5 different prairie plants and 3 different weedy forbs. My quadrat is healthy because there aren’t many weeds. 2005 had 15 weeds and 21 prairie plants. 2006 had 20 prairie plants and 17 weedy forbs. Big Bluestem had more diversity in the quadrat for both years. We didn’t even have Big Bluestem in our quadrat. Why is the diversity of our quadrat, smaller than the others? Why didn’t we have Big Bluestem, but both years did.

    The plant that had the most dominant for my quadrat is Wild Bergamot. Plot 17 for 2005 was Big Bluestem., (For the prairie plants) also, for the year 2006. For the year 2005, Big Bluestem had 4.38 and for the year 2006, it was 21.19. It must have really spread out in the prairie over time. Has it?

    Now let’s compare the importance value. I bet you never would have guessed, but Big Bluestem has the highest importance value, yet again. For 2006-70.41, for 2005-119.07.for the years 2005 and 2006, unlisted grasslike, had the highest importance value. For 2005 it was 172.17, and for 2006 it was181.71. For my quadrat, Wild Bergamot had the highest importance value for prairie plants. For the weeds, Drummonds Aster had the highest importance value. Over all, 2006 had the heist importance values.

 

 

                                                                            -Part 3-

    I think that in the next 10 years Fermi’s weedy forbs will keep increasing their diversity and the prairie plants will decrease a little bit. Also, the Big Bluestem seems to keep getting bigger. It will grow. For the dominance of the big bluestem, it kept getting higher. In the year of 2005, it was only 4.38. Now, in the year 2006, it is 21.19. Also, for the 2005, there were only 15 weedy forbs and now there are 17. That is a good thing and I bad thing. First of all that means that there are more plants, but the more weedy forbs the more water is taken up by them, leaving the prairie plants with less water. In the year 2005 there were 21 prairie plants, but now there are only 20. That not a big difference, but it does show it is decreasing. There for, I think that in the next 10 years Fermi’s weedy forbs will keep increasing their diversity and the prairie plants will decrease a little bit. Making the Big Bluestem more diverse.

 

 

                                                                            

                                                                             -Part 4-

    Ever since we went to Fermi, I learned that prairies are more than just grass. Prairies have all different kinds of plants. I also learned how prairies are managed. We learned how to measure rain and how to find out the sunlight power. We now know how to find how moist the ground can be. Do you know that the closer you are to the ground in the prairie, the warmer? Well that’s what we learned! It is very windy in the prairie. So we were taught how to use this tool to find out how windy it is. There is moister in the air at a prairie, believe it or not! There is this tool that has 2 thermometers on it, one for the moister in the air. You then use a graph, after it shows up on the thermometer. In conclusion, I learned that prairies are more than just grass; they have so much importance and facts to them.

 

 

                                                                                                    = ]

 

 


COPYRIGHT:

© Copyright 2006, L&T Natural Images and Madison Jr. High, all rights reserved. Contact information: email at lccwik@comcast.net or tcoutts@naperville203.org


ACKNOWLEDGMENT:
This project was created by the 7th grade students of team 7 UPS from Madison Jr. High, Naperville Consolidated Unit School District #203 in Naperville, Illinois with the help of their teacher Mrs. Trudi Coutts along with Technology Lab Director Mrs. Margaret Gilmore. Support for the project came from Principal Ms. Erin Anderson and the other dedicated and cooperative faculty and staff of Madison Jr. High.

 


REFERENCES:
Fermilab Education Department particularly the SIMply Prairie Project. Authors: Bill Fraccaro, Johnson School, Wheaton, IL; Larry Cwik and Pat Franzen, Madison Junior High School, Naperville, IL; and Bernie Jokiel, Gary D, Jewel Middle School, North Aurora, IL.
Created for the NTEP II Fermilab LInC program sponsored by Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Education Office and Friends of Fermilab, and funded by United States Department of Energy, Illinois State Board of Education, North Central Regional Technology in Education Consortium which is operated by North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL), and the National Science Foundation.