Welcome To CJ's Webpage..... Fermi Lab 2006FERMI QUADRANT PRAIRIE STUDY 2006

Back to Period 3 Student List

GPS LOCATION: N:__41 50 ' 28.3________    W:__88 16' 23.9_________

STUDENT RESEARCHER: __C.J __________________

Top Data Table Graphs Comparative Analysis
 










Our Quadrant's Map                                                                                    KEY

 

DATA:

Table Of Our Fermi Quadrant

Plant Name Total # of plants found Total Percentage Dominance Importance Value
Big Bluestem 461 49 49 2844
Sweet Clover 6 1 1 64
Yarrow 1 0.5 0.5 34
Tall Goldenrod 14 5 5 176
Prairie Dock 3 1 1 52

Table of All Quadrants of Plot 17

RAW DATA                      
Native Plants Total Plants Found Total Percentage Found # of Quadrats Found In Density Frequency Dominance Relative Density Relative Frequency Relative Dominance Importance Value
Big Bluestem 200 423 11 16.67 0.92 35.25 40.57 27.5 48.62 116.69  
Compass Plant 12 30 1 1 0.08 2.5 2.43 2.5 3.45 8.38  
Indian Grass 126 222 8 10.5 0.67 18.5 25.56 20 25.52 71.08  
Switch Grass 34 38 2 2.83 0.17 3.17 6.9 5 4.37 16.27  
Prairie Dock 7 44 3 0.58 0.25 3.67 1.42 7.5 5.06 13.98  
Rosinweed 6 5 3 0.5 0.25 0.42 1.22 7.5 0.57 9.29  
Yellow Coneflower 5 4 2 0.42 0.17 0.33 1.01 5 0.46 6.47  
Wild Bergamot 91 80 4 7.58 0.33 6.67 18.46 10 9.2 37.65  
New England Aster 1 15 1 0.08 0.08 1.25 0.2 2.5 1.72 4.43  
Tall Boneset 8 7 3 0.67 0.25 0.58 1.62 7.5 0.81 9.93  
Foxglove Beard Tongue 1 1 1 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.2 2.5 0.12 2.82  
Indian Hemp 2 1 1 0.17 0.08 0.08 0.41 2.5 0.12 3.02  
                     
Non-Native (Weed) Plants Total Plants Found Total Percentage Found # of Quadrats Found In Density Frequency Dominance Relative Density Relative Frequency Relative Dominance Importance Value
Daisy Fleabane 1 1 1 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.02 3.03 0.16 3.21  
Wild Carrot 86 18 3 7.17 0.25 1.5 2.02 9.09 2.85 13.96  
Sweet Clovers (tall) 168 140 5 14 0.42 11.67 3.95 15.15 22.15 41.26  
Yarrow 18 27 4 1.5 0.33 2.25 0.42 12.12 4.27 16.82  
Tall goldenrod 25 16 4 2.08 0.33 1.33 0.59 12.12 2.53 15.24  
Clovers (ground) 2 10 1 0.17 0.08 0.83 0.05 3.03 1.58 4.66  
Hairy Vetch 3 17 2 0.25 0.17 1.42 0.07 6.06 2.69 8.82  
Drummonds Aster 6 4 1 0.5 0.08 0.33 0.14 3.03 0.63 3.8  
Unlisted-Oval leaf 111 154 4 9.25 0.33 12.83 2.61 12.12 24.37 39.1  
Unlisted-Grasslike 3831 245 8 319.25 0.67 20.42 90.12 24.24 38.77 153.13  
                     
SORTED DATA BELOW                      
                     
Native Plants by Dominance Dominance   Native Plants by I.V Importance Value              
Big Bluestem 35.25   Big Bluestem 116.69              
Indian Grass 18.5   Indian Grass 71.08              
Wild Bergamot 6.67   Wild Bergamot 37.65              
Prairie Dock 3.67   Switch Grass 16.27              
Switch Grass 3.17   Prairie Dock 13.98              
Compass Plant 2.5   Tall Boneset 9.93              
New England Aster 1.25   Rosinweed 9.29              
Tall Boneset 0.58   Compass Plant 8.38              
Rosinweed 0.42   Yellow Coneflower 6.47              
Yellow Coneflower 0.33   New England Aster 4.43              
Foxglove Beard Tongue 0.08   Indian Hemp 3.02              
Indian Hemp 0.08   Foxglove Beard Tongue 2.82              
                     
                     
Non-Native (Weed) Plants by Dominance Dominance   Non-Native (Weed) Plants by I.V. Importance Value              
Unlisted-Grasslike 20.42   Unlisted-Grasslike 153.13              
Unlisted-Oval leaf 12.83   Sweet Clovers (tall) 41.26              
Sweet Clovers (tall) 11.67   Unlisted-Oval leaf 39.1              
Yarrow 2.25   Yarrow 16.82              
Wild Carrot 1.5   Tall goldenrod 15.24              
Hairy Vetch 1.42   Wild Carrot 13.96              
Tall goldenrod 1.33   Hairy Vetch 8.82              
Clovers (ground) 0.83   Clovers (ground) 4.66              
Drummonds Aster 0.33   Drummonds Aster 3.8              
Daisy Fleabane 0.08   Daisy Fleabane 3.21              
                     
                     
                     
                     
ALL SPECIES Dominance Importance Value   ALL SPECIES Dominance   ALL SPECIES Importance Value      
Big Bluestem 35.25 116.69   Big Bluestem 35.25   Unlisted-Grasslike 153.13      
Compass Plant 2.5 8.38   Unlisted-Grasslike 20.42   Big Bluestem 116.69      
Indian Grass 18.5 71.08   Indian Grass 18.5   Indian Grass 71.08      
Switch Grass 3.17 16.27   Unlisted-Oval leaf 12.83   Sweet Clovers (tall) 41.26      
Prairie Dock 3.67 13.98   Sweet Clovers (tall) 11.67   Unlisted-Oval leaf 39.1      
Rosinweed 0.42 9.29   Wild Bergamot 6.67   Wild Bergamot 37.65      
Yellow Coneflower 0.33 6.47   Prairie Dock 3.67   Yarrow 16.82      
Wild Bergamot 6.67 37.65   Switch Grass 3.17   Switch Grass 16.27      
New England Aster 1.25 4.43   Compass Plant 2.5   Tall goldenrod 15.24      
Tall Boneset 0.58 9.93   Yarrow 2.25   Prairie Dock 13.98      
Foxglove Beard Tongue 0.08 2.82   Wild Carrot 1.5   Wild Carrot 13.96      
Indian Hemp 0.08 3.02   Hairy Vetch 1.42   Tall Boneset 9.93      
Daisy Fleabane 0.08 3.21   Tall goldenrod 1.33   Rosinweed 9.29      
Wild Carrot 1.5 13.96   New England Aster 1.25   Hairy Vetch 8.82      
Sweet Clovers (tall) 11.67 41.26   Clovers (ground) 0.83   Compass Plant 8.38      
Yarrow 2.25 16.82   Tall Boneset 0.58   Yellow Coneflower 6.47      
Tall goldenrod 1.33 15.24   Rosinweed 0.42   Clovers (ground) 4.66      
Clovers (ground) 0.83 4.66   Yellow Coneflower 0.33   New England Aster 4.43      
Hairy Vetch 1.42 8.82   Drummonds Aster 0.33   Drummonds Aster 3.8      
Drummonds Aster 0.33 3.8   Foxglove Beard Tongue 0.08   Daisy Fleabane 3.21      
Unlisted-Oval leaf 12.83 39.1   Indian Hemp 0.08   Indian Hemp 3.02      
Unlisted-Grasslike 20.42 153.13   Daisy Fleabane 0.08   Foxglove Beard Tongue 2.82      

 

 

 

 

top of page

 

 

GRAPHS OF DOMINANCE AND IMPORTANCE VALUE

 

Importance Value Of All

Dominance Value of All

top of page

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS:

Prairies can be described using many sources of background information.

            First is dominance. Dominant Plants are the plants that are most noticeable and take up the most room. They not only take up the most room above ground, but below ground too. They have hugely long roots that are two or three times the size of the plant that is visible above ground. These plants are really valuable because they give food and shelter to animals. They also give shade to smaller plants, and they can change the Ph of the soil because of chemicals in them.

            Also there is importance value. This tells us how dense a plant is in its ecosystem. It also tells us how dominant it is, and how frequent it is. Density is how much of if it there is in an area, dominance is what kind of plant.

            There are also many ways that you can compare the prairie.

            One of the ways is that you can compare the types of plants or diversity of our quadrant with plot 17’s. Most of our quadrant's plants were the same as plot 17’s. We had about the same kind of plants and weeds. However I noticed that more of the plants in our quadrant appeared as time passed.                   

            Also you can compare the dominance of our plants to plot 17’s. The dominance of the plants in our quadrant was very much alike to plot 17’s. Big bluestem was dominant in our quadrant (it took up almost all of the space in our quadrant!) and was every single year in plot 17.    

            Also there is the importance value of our quadrant compared to that of plot 17’s. The importance value total of plot 17’s was about the same amount as our quadrants.

            As a prediction of what is to come for the prairie plant populations I think the following. I think that big bluestem will remain the most dominant plant, because it has been for every year in plot 17 and it was in our quadrant, so maybe that pattern of bluestem dominance will continue.

            I also think there will be a lot more plants and a lot less weeds. This is because they burn the prairie every spring, and the weeds have really short roots compared to the plants, so if the plants burn, they are deep enough into the ground that they can grow back, but the weeds would probably not have a chance of growing back. Also, if there was a drought like there was last year, the weeds would probably not get as much water as the plants, and even if they did get water, they don’t have long roots so they wouldn’t be able to hold it as long.

            I also think that plants like Indian Grass will grow more dominant. I think this because they were only second, third, or fourth in the past years in plot 17. Maybe they will either keep this status because more of them will grow in. Or the parts of the plants like Indian grass that were in fourth might jump to second or third.

            Finally, I learned a lot about prairies.

            The first thing I learned is that all of the factors in the things that keep the plants and weeds alive are connected.

Also, there is a lot of competition between plants. Like if there was a drought because of loss of rain, there would be more competition between plants and weeds, weeds, and plants.

Also, all plants are different. They all need different things, different amounts of things like water and sunlight.

That is what I learned about prairies in my trip to Fermi lab to study plot 17.

 

 

 

 

top of page

COPYRIGHT:

© Copyright 2006, L&T Natural Images and Madison Jr. High, all rights reserved. Contact information: email at lccwik@comcast.net or tcoutts@naperville203.org

ACKNOWLEDGMENT:
This project was created by the 7th grade students of team 7 UPS from Madison Jr. High, Naperville Consolidated Unit School District #203 in Naperville, Illinois with the help of their teacher Mrs. Trudi Coutts along with Technology Lab Director Mrs. Margaret Gilmore. Support for the project came from Principal Ms. Erin Anderson and the other dedicated and cooperative faculty and staff of Madison Jr. High.

 

REFERENCES:
Fermilab Education Department particularly the SIMply Prairie Project. Authors: Bill Fraccaro, Johnson School, Wheaton, IL; Larry Cwik and Pat Franzen, Madison Junior High School, Naperville, IL; and Bernie Jokiel, Gary D, Jewel Middle School, North Aurora, IL.
Created for the NTEP II Fermilab LInC program sponsored by Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Education Office and Friends of Fermilab, and funded by United States Department of Energy, Illinois State Board of Education, North Central Regional Technology in Education Consortium which is operated by North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL), and the National Science Foundation.
top of page

 

Thank You For Visiting my Web Page.... I Hope You Enjoyed It