FERMI QUADRAT PRAIRIE STUDY 2006
Back to Period 2 List of Student
|
|
GPS LOCATION: N:41° 50' 28.3 W:88° 16' 25.0
STUDENT RESEARCHER: Richard C

Aerial view of Fermi prairie quadrat plat 17

| Part1 analysis | ||
| Part 2 analysis | ||
| Part 3 analysis | ||
| Part 4 analysis | ||
Table of our Fermi Quadrat
| Plant name | Total # plants found | Total percentage | Dominance | Importance Value |
| Big Bluestem | 13 | 27 | 27 | 102.7 |
| Indian Grass | 33 | 22 | 22 | 177 |
| Daisy Feabane | 10 | 7 | 7 | 68 |
| Crab Grass | 450 | 15 | 15 | 1837 |
| Unlisted Plants | 20 | 17 | 17 | 119.3 |
Table of all quadrats of plot 17 from team
| RAW DATA | ||||||||
| Native Plants | Total Plants Found | Total Percentage Found | # of Quadrats Found In | Density | Frequency | Dominance | Relative Density | Relative Frequency |
| Big Bluestem | 200 | 423 | 11 | 16.67 | 0.92 | 35.25 | 40.57 | 27.5 |
| Compass Plant | 12 | 30 | 1 | 1 | 0.08 | 2.5 | 2.43 | 2.5 |
| Indian Grass | 126 | 222 | 8 | 10.5 | 0.67 | 18.5 | 25.56 | 20 |
| Switch Grass | 34 | 38 | 2 | 2.83 | 0.17 | 3.17 | 6.9 | 5 |
| Prairie Dock | 7 | 44 | 3 | 0.58 | 0.25 | 3.67 | 1.42 | 7.5 |
| Rosinweed | 6 | 5 | 3 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.42 | 1.22 | 7.5 |
| Yellow Coneflower | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0.42 | 0.17 | 0.33 | 1.01 | 5 |
| Wild Bergamot | 91 | 80 | 4 | 7.58 | 0.33 | 6.67 | 18.46 | 10 |
| New England Aster | 1 | 15 | 1 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 1.25 | 0.2 | 2.5 |
| Tall Boneset | 8 | 7 | 3 | 0.67 | 0.25 | 0.58 | 1.62 | 7.5 |
| Foxglove Beard Tongue | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.2 | 2.5 |
| Indian Hemp | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0.17 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.41 | 2.5 |
| Non-Native (Weed) Plants | Total Plants Found | Total Percentage Found | # of Quadrats Found In | Density | Frequency | Dominance | Relative Density | Relative Frequency |
| Daisy Fleabane | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 3.03 |
| Wild Carrot | 86 | 18 | 3 | 7.17 | 0.25 | 1.5 | 2.02 | 9.09 |
| Sweet Clovers (tall) | 168 | 140 | 5 | 14 | 0.42 | 11.67 | 3.95 | 15.15 |
| Yarrow | 18 | 27 | 4 | 1.5 | 0.33 | 2.25 | 0.42 | 12.12 |
| Tall goldenrod | 25 | 16 | 4 | 2.08 | 0.33 | 1.33 | 0.59 | 12.12 |
| Clovers (ground) | 2 | 10 | 1 | 0.17 | 0.08 | 0.83 | 0.05 | 3.03 |
| Hairy Vetch | 3 | 17 | 2 | 0.25 | 0.17 | 1.42 | 0.07 | 6.06 |
| Drummonds Aster | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.08 | 0.33 | 0.14 | 3.03 |
| Unlisted-Oval leaf | 111 | 154 | 4 | 9.25 | 0.33 | 12.83 | 2.61 | 12.12 |
| Unlisted-Grasslike | 3831 | 245 | 8 | 319.25 | 0.67 | 20.42 | 90.12 | 24.24 |
| SORTED DATA BELOW | ||||||||
| Native Plants by Dominance | Dominance | Native Plants by I.V | Importance Value | |||||
| Big Bluestem | 35.25 | Big Bluestem | 116.69 | |||||
| Indian Grass | 18.5 | Indian Grass | 71.08 | |||||
| Wild Bergamot | 6.67 | Wild Bergamot | 37.65 | |||||
| Prairie Dock | 3.67 | Switch Grass | 16.27 | |||||
| Switch Grass | 3.17 | Prairie Dock | 13.98 | |||||
| Compass Plant | 2.5 | Tall Boneset | 9.93 | |||||
| New England Aster | 1.25 | Rosinweed | 9.29 | |||||
| Tall Boneset | 0.58 | Compass Plant | 8.38 | |||||
| Rosinweed | 0.42 | Yellow Coneflower | 6.47 | |||||
| Yellow Coneflower | 0.33 | New England Aster | 4.43 | |||||
| Foxglove Beard Tongue | 0.08 | Indian Hemp | 3.02 | |||||
| Indian Hemp | 0.08 | Foxglove Beard Tongue | 2.82 | |||||
| Non-Native (Weed) Plants by Dominance | Dominance | Non-Native (Weed) Plants by I.V. | Importance Value | |||||
| Unlisted-Grasslike | 20.42 | Unlisted-Grasslike | 153.13 | |||||
| Unlisted-Oval leaf | 12.83 | Sweet Clovers (tall) | 41.26 | |||||
| Sweet Clovers (tall) | 11.67 | Unlisted-Oval leaf | 39.1 | |||||
| Yarrow | 2.25 | Yarrow | 16.82 | |||||
| Wild Carrot | 1.5 | Tall goldenrod | 15.24 | |||||
| Hairy Vetch | 1.42 | Wild Carrot | 13.96 | |||||
| Tall goldenrod | 1.33 | Hairy Vetch | 8.82 | |||||
| Clovers (ground) | 0.83 | Clovers (ground) | 4.66 | |||||
| Drummonds Aster | 0.33 | Drummonds Aster | 3.8 | |||||
| Daisy Fleabane | 0.08 | Daisy Fleabane | 3.21 | |||||
| ALL SPECIES | Dominance | Importance Value | ALL SPECIES | Dominance | ALL SPECIES | Importance Value | ||
| Big Bluestem | 35.25 | 116.69 | Big Bluestem | 35.25 | Unlisted-Grasslike | 153.13 | ||
| Compass Plant | 2.5 | 8.38 | Unlisted-Grasslike | 20.42 | Big Bluestem | 116.69 | ||
| Indian Grass | 18.5 | 71.08 | Indian Grass | 18.5 | Indian Grass | 71.08 | ||
| Switch Grass | 3.17 | 16.27 | Unlisted-Oval leaf | 12.83 | Sweet Clovers (tall) | 41.26 | ||
| Prairie Dock | 3.67 | 13.98 | Sweet Clovers (tall) | 11.67 | Unlisted-Oval leaf | 39.1 | ||
| Rosinweed | 0.42 | 9.29 | Wild Bergamot | 6.67 | Wild Bergamot | 37.65 | ||
| Yellow Coneflower | 0.33 | 6.47 | Prairie Dock | 3.67 | Yarrow | 16.82 | ||
| Wild Bergamot | 6.67 | 37.65 | Switch Grass | 3.17 | Switch Grass | 16.27 | ||
| New England Aster | 1.25 | 4.43 | Compass Plant | 2.5 | Tall goldenrod | 15.24 | ||
| Tall Boneset | 0.58 | 9.93 | Yarrow | 2.25 | Prairie Dock | 13.98 | ||
| Foxglove Beard Tongue | 0.08 | 2.82 | Wild Carrot | 1.5 | Wild Carrot | 13.96 | ||
| Indian Hemp | 0.08 | 3.02 | Hairy Vetch | 1.42 | Tall Boneset | 9.93 | ||
| Daisy Fleabane | 0.08 | 3.21 | Tall goldenrod | 1.33 | Rosinweed | 9.29 | ||
| Wild Carrot | 1.5 | 13.96 | New England Aster | 1.25 | Hairy Vetch | 8.82 | ||
| Sweet Clovers (tall) | 11.67 | 41.26 | Clovers (ground) | 0.83 | Compass Plant | 8.38 | ||
| Yarrow | 2.25 | 16.82 | Tall Boneset | 0.58 | Yellow Coneflower | 6.47 | ||
| Tall goldenrod | 1.33 | 15.24 | Rosinweed | 0.42 | Clovers (ground) | 4.66 | ||
| Clovers (ground) | 0.83 | 4.66 | Yellow Coneflower | 0.33 | New England Aster | 4.43 | ||
| Hairy Vetch | 1.42 | 8.82 | Drummonds Aster | 0.33 | Drummonds Aster | 3.8 | ||
| Drummonds Aster | 0.33 | 3.8 | Foxglove Beard Tongue | 0.08 | Daisy Fleabane | 3.21 | ||
| Unlisted-Oval leaf | 12.83 | 39.1 | Indian Hemp | 0.08 | Indian Hemp | 3.02 | ||
| Unlisted-Grasslike | 20.42 | 153.13 | Daisy Fleabane | 0.08 | Foxglove Beard Tongue | 2.82 | ||
GRAPHS OF DOMINANCE AND IMPORTANCE VALUE:


Graphs of dominance and importance values for all quatrats


The three main topic I used to compare. They are domance, importance value, and diversity these tell a lot about the statue and health of the prairie. In my quadrat the reason that domance is important is because it tells how much space or area that a type of plant takes up, but the more space taken up might not be the most of the plant because domance counts size too. Domance not only tells the plants area above ground but also under there is three times as much of the plant under than above. The reason that importance value is important is because it tells how much of a plant there is you might be thinking doesn’t domance already tell you? No, it doesn’t domance only tells how much plants take up. The plants can be bigger for example there was very little domance of crabgrass in my quadrat, but importance value is very high because there is 30 in each 10 by 10 cm square of crabgrass, but only 6 in each 10 by 10 square of big blue stem. Diversity is somewhat like domance, but somewhat different. Diversity is total number of plants of a certain species that means it is just a small area in other words diversity is just domance in a smaller area it helps because some areas might have all weeds, but some areas might have all grass. Also all of that data is added up you don’t know the individuals in domance that’s how diversity comes in. Now you know each comparison and how to use them and why.
The difference between my and the whole groups is that it didn’t have that many types meaning that when something grows it grows in close places like they don’t stay away from each other, but they also don’t want them to grow is a big cluster usually a smaller cluster in some prairie. Meaning some might have a lot of a plant some can have very little. I only had seven plants varieties in my quadrat. Doesn’t matter because I have a lot of each. In based in my schools quadrat and its three years ago didn’t change much expect for one thing I am not sure that if unlisted is crabgrass but there is a increase of it every year. And the weeds stayed around that area expect two years ago there was a big die out of grasses and a large increase in weeds in that year the domance of crabgrass was a whooping 42.60 that’s almost 50% of the whole prairie is crab grass but next year it got better they lowered. Maybe because they burn it every year and grasses have long roots so they took over again. The importance value of the items in my quadrat was much larger because plants grow in a cluster explained in part one (link) the domance was much larger than the total schools because I had less plants to work with.
I predict that there won’t be a huge change maybe one year more weeds and another year more grasses, but I think if no flood natural disaster comes it will be fine. Also, I noticed that in one year, there was a significant increase in weeds. I don’t know why, but also, the year after that, the weeds decreased. I thought that either they burned the prairie or there was a huge drought. Burning the prairie is actually better for the grasses. The grass has long roots that could grow back into plants, but the weeds don’t. The reason drought helped is because the grasses have three times the length in their roots than weeds. The grasses are native plants and have adapted to the environment. Unlike the grasses, the weeds are non-native and would die in a drought.
I learned a lot in this activity. I learned how plants can affect us. Without prairie reserves, some very unique plants will be extinct and we helped a lot too, by doing this activity, every year, we helped the unaware scientists count the plants and see if there is a lot of weeds and if they need to plant more grasses or burn some. In this project, we can restore how Illinois used to be thousands of years ago possibly, better.
COPYRIGHT:
© Copyright 2006, L&T Natural Images and Madison Jr. High, all rights reserved. Contact information: email at lccwik@comcast.net or tcoutts@naperville203.org
ACKNOWLEDGMENT:
This project was created by the 7th grade
students of team 7 UPS from Madison Jr. High, Naperville Consolidated Unit
School District #203 in Naperville, Illinois with the help of their teacher Mrs.
Trudi Coutts along with Technology Lab Director Mrs. Margaret Gilmore. Support
for the project came from Principal Ms. Erin Anderson and the other dedicated
and cooperative faculty and staff of Madison Jr. High.
REFERENCES:
Fermilab Education Department particularly the SIMply
Prairie Project. Authors: Bill Fraccaro, Johnson School, Wheaton, IL; Larry Cwik
and Pat Franzen, Madison Junior High School, Naperville, IL; and Bernie Jokiel,
Gary D, Jewel Middle School, North Aurora, IL.
Created for the NTEP II
Fermilab LInC program sponsored by Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
Education Office and Friends of Fermilab, and funded by United States Department
of Energy, Illinois State Board of Education, North Central Regional Technology
in Education Consortium which is operated by North Central Regional Educational
Laboratory (NCREL), and the National Science Foundation.