FERMI QUADRAT PRAIRIE STUDY 2006


Back to Period 2 List of Student



Top

Data Table

Graphs

Comparative Analysis


GPS LOCATION: N:41°50'28.3"    W:88°16'24.6"

STUDENT RESEARCHER: Greg C

Arial view of Fermi Lab

 



(INSERT YOUR LINKS IN THE LINKS TABLE BELOW. DELETE THIS WHEN DONE.)

maps


















 

DATA:

 

 

Plant Name Plants Found Total Percentage Dominance Importance Value
Big Bluestem 12 17 17 102.5
Indian Grass 17 16 16 120.5
Wild Bergamont 6 1 1 38.9
Sweet Clovers (tall) 12 3 3 67.9
Wild Carrot 5 2 2 16.74
Yarrow 3 1 1 26.9
Tall Goldenrod 1 0.1 0.1 37.4

 

Table of all Quadrats of plot 17

 

RAW DATA                      
Native Plants Total Plants Found Total Percentage Found # of Quadrats Found In Density Frequency Dominance Relative Density Relative Frequency Relative Dominance Importance Value
Big Bluestem 200 423 11 16.67 0.92 35.25 40.57 27.5 48.62 116.69  
Compass Plant 12 30 1 1 0.08 2.5 2.43 2.5 3.45 8.38  
Indian Grass 126 222 8 10.5 0.67 18.5 25.56 20 25.52 71.08  
Switch Grass 34 38 2 2.83 0.17 3.17 6.9 5 4.37 16.27  
Prairie Dock 7 44 3 0.58 0.25 3.67 1.42 7.5 5.06 13.98  
Rosinweed 6 5 3 0.5 0.25 0.42 1.22 7.5 0.57 9.29  
Yellow Coneflower 5 4 2 0.42 0.17 0.33 1.01 5 0.46 6.47  
Wild Bergamot 91 80 4 7.58 0.33 6.67 18.46 10 9.2 37.65  
New England Aster 1 15 1 0.08 0.08 1.25 0.2 2.5 1.72 4.43  
Tall Boneset 8 7 3 0.67 0.25 0.58 1.62 7.5 0.81 9.93  
Foxglove Beard Tongue 1 1 1 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.2 2.5 0.12 2.82  
Indian Hemp 2 1 1 0.17 0.08 0.08 0.41 2.5 0.12 3.02  
                     
Non-Native (Weed) Plants Total Plants Found Total Percentage Found # of Quadrats Found In Density Frequency Dominance Relative Density Relative Frequency Relative Dominance Importance Value
Daisy Fleabane 1 1 1 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.02 3.03 0.16 3.21  
Wild Carrot 86 18 3 7.17 0.25 1.5 2.02 9.09 2.85 13.96  
Sweet Clovers (tall) 168 140 5 14 0.42 11.67 3.95 15.15 22.15 41.26  
Yarrow 18 27 4 1.5 0.33 2.25 0.42 12.12 4.27 16.82  
Tall goldenrod 25 16 4 2.08 0.33 1.33 0.59 12.12 2.53 15.24  
Clovers (ground) 2 10 1 0.17 0.08 0.83 0.05 3.03 1.58 4.66  
Hairy Vetch 3 17 2 0.25 0.17 1.42 0.07 6.06 2.69 8.82  
Drummonds Aster 6 4 1 0.5 0.08 0.33 0.14 3.03 0.63 3.8  
Unlisted-Oval leaf 111 154 4 9.25 0.33 12.83 2.61 12.12 24.37 39.1  
Unlisted-Grasslike 3831 245 8 319.25 0.67 20.42 90.12 24.24 38.77 153.13  
                     
SORTED DATA BELOW                      
                     
Native Plants by Dominance Dominance   Native Plants by I.V Importance Value              
Big Bluestem 35.25   Big Bluestem 116.69              
Indian Grass 18.5   Indian Grass 71.08              
Wild Bergamot 6.67   Wild Bergamot 37.65              
Prairie Dock 3.67   Switch Grass 16.27              
Switch Grass 3.17   Prairie Dock 13.98              
Compass Plant 2.5   Tall Boneset 9.93              
New England Aster 1.25   Rosinweed 9.29              
Tall Boneset 0.58   Compass Plant 8.38              
Rosinweed 0.42   Yellow Coneflower 6.47              
Yellow Coneflower 0.33   New England Aster 4.43              
Foxglove Beard Tongue 0.08   Indian Hemp 3.02              
Indian Hemp 0.08   Foxglove Beard Tongue 2.82              
                     
                     
Non-Native (Weed) Plants by Dominance Dominance   Non-Native (Weed) Plants by I.V. Importance Value              
Unlisted-Grasslike 20.42   Unlisted-Grasslike 153.13              
Unlisted-Oval leaf 12.83   Sweet Clovers (tall) 41.26              
Sweet Clovers (tall) 11.67   Unlisted-Oval leaf 39.1              
Yarrow 2.25   Yarrow 16.82              
Wild Carrot 1.5   Tall goldenrod 15.24              
Hairy Vetch 1.42   Wild Carrot 13.96              
Tall goldenrod 1.33   Hairy Vetch 8.82              
Clovers (ground) 0.83   Clovers (ground) 4.66              
Drummonds Aster 0.33   Drummonds Aster 3.8              
Daisy Fleabane 0.08   Daisy Fleabane 3.21              
                     
                     
                     
                     
ALL SPECIES Dominance Importance Value ALL SPECIES Dominance   ALL SPECIES Importance Value      
Big Bluestem 35.25 116.69   Big Bluestem 35.25   Unlisted-Grasslike 153.13      
Compass Plant 2.5 8.38   Unlisted-Grasslike 20.42   Big Bluestem 116.69      
Indian Grass 18.5 71.08   Indian Grass 18.5   Indian Grass 71.08      
Switch Grass 3.17 16.27   Unlisted-Oval leaf 12.83   Sweet Clovers (tall) 41.26      
Prairie Dock 3.67 13.98   Sweet Clovers (tall) 11.67   Unlisted-Oval leaf 39.1      
Rosinweed 0.42 9.29   Wild Bergamot 6.67   Wild Bergamot 37.65      
Yellow Coneflower 0.33 6.47   Prairie Dock 3.67   Yarrow 16.82      
Wild Bergamot 6.67 37.65   Switch Grass 3.17   Switch Grass 16.27      
New England Aster 1.25 4.43   Compass Plant 2.5   Tall goldenrod 15.24      
Tall Boneset 0.58 9.93   Yarrow 2.25   Prairie Dock 13.98      
Foxglove Beard Tongue 0.08 2.82   Wild Carrot 1.5   Wild Carrot 13.96      
Indian Hemp 0.08 3.02   Hairy Vetch 1.42   Tall Boneset 9.93      
Daisy Fleabane 0.08 3.21   Tall goldenrod 1.33   Rosinweed 9.29      
Wild Carrot 1.5 13.96   New England Aster 1.25   Hairy Vetch 8.82      
Sweet Clovers (tall) 11.67 41.26   Clovers (ground) 0.83   Compass Plant 8.38      
Yarrow 2.25 16.82   Tall Boneset 0.58   Yellow Coneflower 6.47      
Tall goldenrod 1.33 15.24   Rosinweed 0.42   Clovers (ground) 4.66      
Clovers (ground) 0.83 4.66   Yellow Coneflower 0.33   New England Aster 4.43      
Hairy Vetch 1.42 8.82   Drummonds Aster 0.33   Drummonds Aster 3.8      
Drummonds Aster 0.33 3.8   Foxglove Beard Tongue 0.08   Daisy Fleabane 3.21      
Unlisted-Oval leaf 12.83 39.1   Indian Hemp 0.08   Indian Hemp 3.02      
Unlisted-Grasslike 20.42 153.13   Daisy Fleabane 0.08   Foxglove Beard Tongue 2.82      
                     

 

 


 

GRAPHS OF DOMINANCE AND IMPORTANCE VALUE:

 

Graphs of Dominance and importance value for all Quadrats

 


COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS:

In 7th grade we studied prairie plants. We studied them by learning what dominance, importance value, and diversity. We did this by using 1m by 1m squares called quadrats. By learning these techniques, we were rewarded with a trip to Fermi lab. If you would like to learn about this, read on.

Background Information: First lets start with dominance. Dominance is the most noticeable to see. Because dominance shows us which plant takes up the most space or is thriving the best. The more dominant plants effect the other plants by, not giving that much growing room, and taking more sunlight. They effect animals in a more positive way by giving more food source, and living space. As you can see dominance is very important when it comes to comparing data

Next lets talk about importance value. Importance value is made up of three values. They are made up of relative dominance, relative frequency, and relative density. You add these three things up and get importance value. Importance value is so important because it shows how important the plant is to the environment. This is usually used to compare the prairie plots .over time, to see if the plant increases or decreases in importance.

Finally there is diversity. The definition of diversity says "many different living things living together." You can also look at the variety of plants, and species. In a prairie it is important to have a large variety of plants, cause then the prairie is healthier. So diversity is used to tell which plot is healthier. A wider variety of plants means a wider variety of animals. As anyone can see dominance, importance value and diversity are all very important when it comes to comparing prairie plots and data.

Comparison: The diversity in my quadrat is a lot different then the diversity in plot 17. For instants in my quadrat there is a total of 8 plants when in plot 17 there are many more. Since there is more plants in a larder plot like 17, there is a wider range of different plants. This is because of course there is more land in the whole prairie plot 17 then there is in my little 1m by 1m square. Since my little square is so small its diversity will be smaller. When a wider range like plot 17 total is added up and compare to something smaller like my quadrat the results will be different. Like the most dominant plant in my quadrat is Indian Grass when in the whole plot it is Big blue stem. Once again will comparing you must remember the size difference. As you can see if the a plant is the most dominant then it must be the most important when it comes to importance value. Obviously as one can see size is a very important factor in this complicated equation of prairie plots and quadrats.

Prediction: I think in ten years the prairie will still be abundant of the same plant that it is to this day in 200612007. There has been a pattern for the last fourteen years of switching of between Indian Grass and Big blue stem for the leading dominator. I am able to make this assumption, because in 1992 the first year Madison Junior High started collecting data. Indian Grass was number one for dominance and Big blue stem two.

The next year it switched around. And it has been switching on and off for 1 st and 2nd for the last 14 years. And I don't think it will stop.

Reflection: Throughout this lesson we had learned many thing. And to me I really didn't care to learn al those things I told you about. To tell you the truth this was the hardest longest grueling section I ever did. Making this web page I look back on this right now see how much hard work I did despite the grueling situation. And I feel really good I did this hard work. I don't know if! would ever do it again. But in the end I was glad I did all this work for Fermi lab. Because without all these beautiful plant to cover are beautiful world~ We would not live. So this may sound corny but the 7th graders that attend this field trip every year are almost saving the world.

 

 

 

 


COPYRIGHT:

© Copyright 2006, L&T Natural Images and Madison Jr. High, all rights reserved. Contact information: email at lccwik@comcast.net or tcoutts@naperville203.org


ACKNOWLEDGMENT:
This project was created by the 7th grade students of team 7 UPS from Madison Jr. High, Naperville Consolidated Unit School District #203 in Naperville, Illinois with the help of their teacher Mrs. Trudi Coutts along with Technology Lab Director Mrs. Margaret Gilmore. Support for the project came from Principal Ms. Erin Anderson and the other dedicated and cooperative faculty and staff of Madison Jr. High.

 


REFERENCES:
Fermilab Education Department particularly the SIMply Prairie Project. Authors: Bill Fraccaro, Johnson School, Wheaton, IL; Larry Cwik and Pat Franzen, Madison Junior High School, Naperville, IL; and Bernie Jokiel, Gary D, Jewel Middle School, North Aurora, IL.
Created for the NTEP II Fermilab LInC program sponsored by Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Education Office and Friends of Fermilab, and funded by United States Department of Energy, Illinois State Board of Education, North Central Regional Technology in Education Consortium which is operated by North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL), and the National Science Foundation.