FERMI QUADRAT PRAIRIE STUDY 2006
|
|
GPS LOCATION: N: 41º50'28.2'' W: 88°16'24.6''
STUDENT RESEARCHER: Caitlin
PICTURES:


DATA:
| Plant Name | Dominance | Importance Value |
| Big Bluestem | 5 | 31.923 |
| Indian Grass | 2 | 18.769 |
| Rosinweed | 3 | 23.153 |
| Wild Bergamot | 5 | 51.923 |
| Yellow Coneflower | 3 | 27.153 |
| Fox Glove Beard Tongue | 1 | 14.384 |
| Sweet Clovers (tall) | 60 | 313.076 |
| Yarrow | 6 | 44.307 |
| Unlisted Oval Leaf | 75 | 336.461 |
| Kentucky Bluegrass | 100 | 998.846 |
GRAPHS OF DOMINANCE AND IMPORTANCE VALUE:




Comparative Analysis
Comparing prairie plots helps when making a hypothesis about how plants grow. A prairie is a field full of a variety of different types of biotic plants. A quadrat is the test area that is one square meter. One thing that helps us learn about prairie plots is dominance. Dominance is the total percent a species of plants covers in an area divided by the area used in square meters. Dominance helps us know what plants are most dominant in the prairie. Frequency also helps us learn more about our prairie ecosystem. Frequency is the total number of quadrats you find a plant species in divided by the total number of quadrats. Frequency helps us to know how much a plant species occurs. Diversity helps as much as frequency and dominance does. Diversity is the total number of different species for all quadrats divided by the total number of quadrats. Dominance, frequency, and diversity have one thing in common. They help us determine how much of a plant is in one area. Without them we wouldn’t know everything we know about prairie ecosystems today.
Comparison
Every year, differences and similarities are found between prairie plots. Differences and similarities in dominance, importance value, and diversity for instance. In my quadrat, I found the most dominant plant was Kentucky bluegrass. For everyone’s quadrat in 2006 the most dominant plant was Big Bluestem with a dominance of 24.19. In 2005 the dominant plant is Big Bluestem as well, with a dominance of 4.38. Its’ dominance is 4.38. It has gone down a lot in one year. The reason that the most dominant plant in my quadrat is Kentucky bluegrass is because my quadrat is much smaller than our group’s prairie plot, so the other quadrats had more Big Bluestem than Kentucky bluegrass. Obviously my quadrat is different than the rest of my plot. The plant with the second highest dominance for my quadrat is an unlisted oval leaf. It is funny that it’s very dominant since it needs more water than regular plants. The second highest dominant plant for 2006 and 2005 is Wild Bergamot. Wild Bergamot’s importance value for 2006 is 10.4, and for 2005 it was 4.23. The results for my quadrat our different, again, because my quadrat is smaller than the prairie plot we used.
Next is importance value. The plant with the highest importance value for 2006 is Big bluestem with 119.02. It’s the same for 2005, but the importance value is 70.41. My plant with the highest importance value is Kentucky bluegrass, but that’s just because the area of land I was using was much smaller than the area of land our grade was using. The second plant with the highest importance value for 2005 in the prairie plot is Indian Grass with 37.3. For 2006 it was Wild Bergamot with 47.92. In 2005 the third one was Wild Bergamot, and for 2006 the third one was Indian Grass. They switched! They also did the same for 2004. My plant with the second highest importance value is Tall Sweet Clovers, butt again, that’s just because the area I used is smaller than the area everyone used. I think that the results above can help us determine what different kinds of plants we’ll be seeing in the future.
Next is diversity. For my quadrat we found ten different types of plants. This is most likely because the prairie is much, much bigger than my quadrat. From the results above, my quadrat, the 2005 plot, and the 2006 plot, have many differences, and yet many similarities, that we can’t just tell from numbers.
Prairie Prediction
I predict that in ten years, the prairie will be different. I predict that Big Bluestem will have the highest dominance and importance value in 2016 because it has for the last three years. I predict that since Wild Bergamot and Indian Grass switch for second and third highest importance value that Wild Bergamot will have the second highest importance value, and Indian Grass will have the third. I also predict that since Wild Bergamot has had the second highest dominance for three years running, it will have the second highest dominance in 2016 as well. I also think that since Indian grass has been fighting for third highest dominance with Stiff Goldenrod, which is now down to tenth highest dominance, that it will have the third highest dominance. So basically I’m saying that we’ll be seeing a lot of Big Bluestem, Wild Bergamot, and Indian Grass in the future.
Reflection
I have learned much while studying the prairie ecosystem. One thing I have learned is some differences between plants and weeds. Weeds need a lot more water than plants do, because weed’s roots are much shorter than plants, and water sinks down into the earth, so weeds can only get there water when and shortly after it rains. Plants on the other hand, have long roots that go deep into the ground, and water there doesn’t sink so quickly. I also learned what dominance, importance value, and diversity is. They help us learn more about how different plants grow, and make predictions about our future prairie. I now know what some of the different plants in the prairie look like, such as Big Bluestem, Wild Bergamot, and Indian Grass. The prairie is a complicated place. Plants die, but replenish because of droughts, or a lot of rain. I also know that the prairie is a perfect home for many small rodents, such as prairie dogs, because of the vegetation, climate, and weather. The plants give the animals food, and the temperature is just right for when there awake, and when their hibernating, and the rain gives the plants there water for when their thirsty. The prairie gives life to things, and if something dies out, it affects the whole prairie. The prairie is an interesting place full of wonders and surprises.
Data
| Yellow Coneflower | 17 | 11 | 5 | 0.46 | 0.14 | 0.3 | 0.86 | 3.91 | 0.5 | 5.26 |
| Black-eyed Susan | 10 | 40 | 1 | 0.27 | 0.03 | 1.08 | 0.51 | 0.78 | 1.81 | 3.09 |
| Tall Coreopsis | 20 | 16 | 4 | 0.54 | 0.11 | 0.43 | 1.01 | 3.13 | 0.72 | 4.86 |
| Sawtooth Sunflower | 45 | 62 | 3 | 1.22 | 0.08 | 1.68 | 2.27 | 2.34 | 2.8 | 7.42 |
| Wild Bergamot | 280 | 385 | 21 | 7.57 | 0.57 | 10.4 | 14.13 | 16.41 | 17.38 | 47.92 |
| Mountain Mint | 9 | 6 | 1 | 0.24 | 0.03 | 0.16 | 0.45 | 0.78 | 0.27 | 1.51 |
| New England Aster | 14 | 28 | 5 | 0.38 | 0.14 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 3.91 | 1.26 | 5.88 |
| White Prairie Clover | 21 | 30 | 2 | 0.57 | 0.05 | 0.81 | 1.06 | 1.56 | 1.35 | 3.98 |
| Tall Boneset | 8 | 7 | 3 | 0.22 | 0.08 | 0.19 | 0.4 | 2.34 | 0.32 | 3.06 |
| Heath Aster | 7 | 7 | 2 | 0.19 | 0.05 | 0.19 | 0.35 | 1.56 | 0.32 | 2.23 |
| Foxglove Beard Tongue | 45 | 22 | 5 | 1.22 | 0.14 | 0.59 | 2.27 | 3.91 | 0.99 | 7.17 |
| Indian Hemp | 7 | 3 | 2 | 0.19 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.35 | 1.56 | 0.14 | 2.05 |
| Invasives (Weeds) | ||||||||||
| Non-Native Plant | Total Plants Found | Total Percentage Found | # of Quadrats Found In | Density | Frequency | Dominance | Relative Density | Relative Frequency | Relative Dominance | Importance Value |
| Black Raspberry | 4 | 20 | 2 | 0.11 | 0.05 | 0.54 | 0 | 1.94 | 1.06 | 3.01 |
| Daisy Fleabane | 29 | 4 | 3 | 0.78 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 2.91 | 0.21 | 3.14 |
| Wild Carrot | 86 | 18 | 3 | 2.32 | 0.08 | 0.49 | 0.04 | 2.91 | 0.96 | 3.91 |
| Sweet Clovers (tall) | 435 | 280 | 16 | 11.76 | 0.43 | 7.57 | 0.18 | 15.53 | 14.89 | 30.6 |
| Yarrow | 48 | 69 | 9 | 1.3 | 0.24 | 1.86 | 0.02 | 8.74 | 3.67 | 12.43 |
| Tall goldenrod | 121 | 116 | 15 | 3.27 | 0.41 | 3.14 | 0.05 | 14.56 | 6.17 | 20.78 |
| Common Milkweed | 2 | 14 | 2 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.38 | 0 | 1.94 | 0.74 | 2.69 |
| Clovers (ground) | 7 | 12 | 2 | 0.19 | 0.05 | 0.32 | 0 | 1.94 | 0.64 | 2.58 |
| Hairy Vetch | 14 | 65 | 6 | 0.38 | 0.16 | 1.76 | 0.01 | 5.83 | 3.46 | 9.29 |
| Hairy Aster | 6 | 7 | 2 | 0.16 | 0.05 | 0.19 | 0 | 1.94 | 0.37 | 2.32 |
| Drummonds Aster | 16 | 11 | 4 | 0.43 | 0.11 | 0.3 | 0.01 | 3.88 | 0.58 | 4.47 |
| Dandelion | 13 | 5 | 1 | 0.35 | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.97 | 0.27 | 1.24 |
| Unlisted-Round leaf | 30 | 10 | 1 | 0.81 | 0.03 | 0.27 | 0.01 | 0.97 | 0.53 | 1.51 |
| Unlisted-Oval leaf | 725 | 192 | 8 | 19.59 | 0.22 | 5.19 | 0.3 | 7.77 | 10.21 | 18.28 |
| Unlisted-Grasslike | 238819 | 1056 | 27 | 6454.57 | 0.73 | 28.54 | 99.36 | 26.21 | 56.14 | 181.71 |
| Unlisted-Triangular Pointed Leaf | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0 | 1.94 | 0.11 | 2.05 |
| Total Data RAW DATA |
COPYRIGHT:
© Copyright 2006, L&T Natural Images and Madison Jr. High, all rights reserved. Contact information: email at lccwik@comcast.net or tcoutts@naperville203.org
ACKNOWLEDGMENT:
This project was created by the 7th grade
students of team 7 UPS from Madison Jr. High, Naperville Consolidated Unit
School District #203 in Naperville, Illinois with the help of their teacher Mrs.
Trudi Coutts along with Technology Lab Director Mrs. Margaret Gilmore. Support
for the project came from Principal Ms. Erin Anderson and the other dedicated
and cooperative faculty and staff of Madison Jr. High.
REFERENCES:
Fermilab Education Department particularly the SIMply
Prairie Project. Authors: Bill Fraccaro, Johnson School, Wheaton, IL; Larry Cwik
and Pat Franzen, Madison Junior High School, Naperville, IL; and Bernie Jokiel,
Gary D, Jewel Middle School, North Aurora, IL.
Created for the NTEP II
Fermilab LInC program sponsored by Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
Education Office and Friends of Fermilab, and funded by United States Department
of Energy, Illinois State Board of Education, North Central Regional Technology
in Education Consortium which is operated by North Central Regional Educational
Laboratory (NCREL), and the National Science Foundation.
Prairie Pictures

