Information Technology 1

Running head:  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY



 

 

 

  

Information Technology Courses in northern Illinois High Schools:

An Evaluation of Cisco Academy Curriculum

 In High School Information Technology Programs.



 

 

 

 

 

 
Brett A. Thompson 

 


 

 

 

 
 

A master’s project presented in partial fulfillment

of the requirements for the Master of Arts Degree

in Educational Leadership – EDL 529

University of Illinois at Springfield 

July 23, 2003

Information Technology 2

 

Table of Contents

I      INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………..……………...…… 4

                Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………. 4

                Background …………………………………………………………………………   .  8

                Problem Statement …………………………………………………………………   .. 10

                Research Questions ………….……….……………………………………….………. 11

II      REVIEW OF LITERATURE …………………………………………………….…….… 14

                Introduction …………………………………………………………………….…   … 14

                Information Technology Certifications and Their Demand …………………….…..… 15

                Overview of Information Technology Programs ……………………………..….…… 17

Arguments Opposing Proprietary IT Certifications for High School Students ….….... 18

Arguments in Favor of Proprietary IT Certifications for High School Students ……..  24

                Conclusion …………………………………………………….……………….……..  25

III     METHODOLOGY ………………………………………………………….……….…… 27

                Rationale of the Design …………………………………………………………..…… 27

                Site Selection/Subjects …………………………………………………………..……. 27

                Instruments …………………………………………………………………..………... 28

                Procedures for Data Collection ……………………………………………..………… 31

                Procedure for Data Analysis ………………………………………………..…   ……  31

IV     RESULTS …………………………………………………………………….….….…… 33

 

                Introduction …………………………..……………………..………………………... 33

 

                Research Question One ………………..………………………..……………………. 33

 

                Research Question Two ………………..…………………………..………………… 36

 

                Research Question Three  ………………..………………………..…………………. 43

               

                Research Question Four …………………..…………………………..……………… 46

 

                Conclusion ……………………………………………………………..………..…… 48

Information Technology 3

  V     DISCUSSION ………………………………………………………………………… 49

                Introduction …………………………………………………….………………….. 49

                Analysis of Research Question One ……………………………………….………. 49 

                Analysis of Research Question Two ……………………………………….………. 52

                Analysis of Research Question Three, Part I ……………………………….……… 54

                Analysis of Research Question Three, Part II ………………………………..…….. 60

                Analysis of Research Question Four …………………………………………..…… 61

                Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………..…… 65

                Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research ……………………………..…… 66

                Recommendations for Administrators …………………………………………….… 67

REFERENCES …………………………………………………………………….…………. 70

APPENDIX  A – Cover Letter ……………………………………………………………..… 74

 

APPENDIX B – Survey …..………………………………………………….………………. 75

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Information Technology 4

 

CHAPTER 1

 

INTRODUCTION

 

 

Introduction

 

            The purpose of this study was to determine the perceptions of northern Illinois Cisco Academy high school teachers to infer the appropriateness of the proprietary Cisco Computer Networking Academies’ curriculum in high schools. The intent of this study was not to determine the appropriateness of the proprietary Cisco Computer Networking Academies’ curriculum in post-secondary education.  Since its inception in 1997, Cisco’s curriculum has infiltrated thousands of high schools across the United States and around the world for two reasons.  First, Cisco has a large portion of the computer networking market, and therefore has the resources and interest to focus on developing high school academies.  Second, high school curriculum development teams recognize the need for skilled employees in the information technology (IT) industry and have therefore searched for information technology curriculum.  As a result, thousands of high school students are being exposed to Cisco’s proprietary training when they are deficient in fundamental computer skills, employment and transferable skills, and life-long learning skills.

Cisco’s intent is commendable, but many educators and industry leaders question the appropriateness of the Cisco Academy at the high school level.  Dianne Mondry, President of the Association for Career and Technical Education, states:

 

 

Information Technology 5

The purpose or mission of career and technical education is to provide students with an opportunity to learn academic and technical skills, explore different career options, and discover ways to balance life and work roles.  We’re about lifelong

learning, and we recognize that there cannot be dead ends at any level of education (NEA Today, 2002, p. 11).

 Today’s high school students need contemporary computer education that teaches students sound fundamentals across a broad cluster of computing concepts.  In reality, most high school students in IT courses are being taught proprietary skills that are based upon one manufacturer’s curriculum and proprietary equipment. 

High schools have focused, and should continue to focus, on rigorous curriculum based upon a balanced blend of conceptual and lab-based experiences to educate students on essential and rudimentary computer skills.  These essential and rudimentary computer skills develop students into life-long learners in which their formal high school computer training can be drawn from and utilized in any IT career, not merely “pigeon-holing” students into a proprietary computer network training course alone.  This study proves through qualitative and quantitative data that high school students need vendor-neutral training on computer cluster fundamentals before studying higher-level proprietary Cisco curriculum. 

The need for properly educated and trained personnel in IT is profound.  According to a report by Carolyn Veneri (1998) for the U.S. Department of Labor and Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Database administrators, computer support specialists, and

 

Information Technology 6

all other computer scientists, computer engineers, and system analysts are projected to be the fastest growing occupations between 1996 and 2006, and job openings should be

plentiful” (p.6 ).  Thus, there seems to be little debate over the need for professional certifications in the IT field.  In fact, computer professionals are taking in more training and testing than ever before.  Gabelhouse (2000), in an article for Certification Magazine titled Salary Survey, writes about a study conducted by International Data Corporation (IDC).  IDC research found that the IT training and testing industries reached $2.5 billion in 1999 and is expected to reach $4.1 billion by 2003, a 15 percent growth rate (as cited in Certification Magazine, 2000, p.30).  Research shows certifications have proven to be critical components of successful IT employees.

Training, testing, and certification vary in type and amount depending on what certification one is pursuing.  Evans and Henry (2000), authors of Computer Certification Updates for Technical Educators, explain certifications in general as: “One way for those who are in a technical field to enter and/or advance in the job market is to be able to show employers that they have appropriate credentials.  Certification is one type of credentialing that is gaining popularity, not only with employees but also with employers” (p.10).  The other “type of credentialing” Evans and Henry are referring to is experience.  The most desired employees have a complimentary blend of certification and experience.  

            According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), between 1996 and 2006, the United States will require more than 1.3 million new IT workers, an average of about 137,800 per year.  Of these, 1,134,000 workers will be needed to fill newly created jobs

 

Information Technology 7

and 244,000 to replace retirees, change of professions and other reasons (Department of Commerce, 1996, p.1).  The benefits of certification appear to benefit both the employer and the employee.  For the employee, “Studies have shown that certification enhances job satisfaction, increases productivity, and provides the incentive for better performance”

(Evans & Henry, 2000, p.10).  For the employer, “Certification can demonstrate to prospective employers through documentation that an individual has the knowledge, skills, discipline, and determination to succeed.  It can be used to screen prospective

employees.  Studies show that companies with certified employees have improved productivity and less unscheduled down time than those organizations with no certified employees”  (Evans & Henry, 2000, p.10).  Certification is an important part of the IT industry and has led to different paths in earning an IT certification.

The need to educate and train thousands of new people has become a leading concern for high school IT departments as well as IT businesses.  As a result, two certification paths have resulted.  The first path is education.  Educating students involves teaching core background knowledge, applicable technical skills, transferable employment and life-long learning strategies, and test taking tactics.  The education paths can start in high school and lead to post-secondary opportunities at tech schools, community colleges, and universities.  The second path is training.  Training students involves teaching only current applicable technical skills to get a certification.  Current applicable technical skills quickly expire after a few years forcing the student to retrain

 

Information Technology 8

and be subjected to employment uncertainty due to outdated skills.  The training path can be justified when it is coupled with education.  But many times training is used as a

shortcut or bandage for quick, but often, short-lived employment.  The training path is through stand-alone proprietary curriculum and third party trainers that offer certification “boot camps” for the sole purpose of earning an IT certification.

 

Background

In an attempt to reduce the gap between open job opportunities and bodies to fill those positions, computer technology companies have discovered a great untapped

resource, high school students.  For example, in their Academy Overview (1998b) material, Cisco includes a report titled Certificate Program Aims to Fill Shortage of Qualified Network Administrators.  The website begins with “Cisco Systems, Inc., the worldwide leader in networking for the Internet, has partnered with Education to provide a training program designed to address the current national shortage of information technology workers” (Cisco Systems, 1998b, p.1).  The overview goes on to mention, “In the program, graduates gain the skills necessary to fill some of the estimated 346,000 high-technology jobs that are currently available in businesses throughout the United States” (Cisco Systems, 1998b, p.1).  The author, who is CompTIA’s A+ and Network+ certified and certified to teach Cisco curriculum, believes the Cisco curriculum is valuable material that can aid one in achieving success with the Cisco certification exams.  However, the notion of Cisco filling “some of the estimated 346,000 high-technology jobs” with inexperienced high school students is a bit daunting. 

Information Technology 9

Certifications are evidence to an employer stating one’s skills and abilities.  However, they are valuable only with an accommodating blend of experience.  For

example, one can compare a certification to a driver’s license.  Sixteen year olds get their drivers license, but it is a stretch to say they are experienced professional drivers ready for the most challenging road conditions.  Prometric, an IT leader in training and certification, recently released their annual study of IT certification called 2002 Global IT Training and Certification Study:  Shifting Values in the Journey to Certification.  In the research, one anonymous IT Manager writes:

Today, you have literally kids majoring in computer science – I’ve got a kid there right now who’s on the co-op program for school and he’s just here until December.  He’s still in school and his resume said in the summer he worked for Burger King.  I mean he’s never been in an IT shop, so how much can that certification really mean?  It means absolutely nothing in this case other than he read the books and he was able to spit back what he read” (2002, p. 26). 

Certifications are a valued commodity by both employers and employees.  However, many employers value work experience just as equally, if not more, than certifications. 

The author was unable to find any material on the number of high school students in Illinois or the U.S. that were currently enrolled in IT courses, particularly professional certification courses.  As a result, the author was unable to find the percentage of high school students who successfully pass proprietary or industry neutral certification exams.  One of the results of this research project has been to determine the success rate of

 

Information Technology 10

northern Illinois high school students taking the Cisco Certified Network Associate (CCNA) exams. 

 

Problem Statements

 

            The increasing need for certified computer professionals has created a new paradigm unknown to teachers, community colleges and universities only five years ago. 

What has been created is “an educational and training enterprise that is transnational and competency-based, confers certifications not degrees, and exists beyond governments’

notice or control.  And is much bigger than we imagine” (Adelman, 2000, p. 1).  Because of the large demand, the need for quickly certified technicians has created some information technology curriculum that is overwhelmingly overloaded with vendor specific content that has a questionable effect on high school students’ success. 

On the other hand, industry neutral certification courses, like CompTIA’s, do contain curriculum that is responded to well and successfully achieved by high school students.  In other words, some computer technology companies have created largely proprietary curricula whose purpose may be free access to thousands of high school students around the world.  Sosbe (2001), editor of Certification Magazine, says it this way:  “Consider this gap in today’s training puzzle:  To fly a certain plane, a pilot must be certified in that plane’s operations.  But before the pilot can be certified, she must be licensed to fly in the first place.  In IT, we have the certifications, but not the licensure” (p. 4).  Proprietary curriculums are like the certification; vendor-neutral curriculum is like the license.  The proprietary curriculum trains students on higher-level product details as a replacement for educating students on IT fundamentals. 

Information Technology 11

Schools are traditionally places of new trends.  However, not all educators agree with the evolvement of proprietary IT curriculum in high schools.  In his research, The New Networkers:  The Path to Hot Jobs Begins in High School, Bushweller (2001)

quotes Ivan Charner, the Director of the National Institute for Work and Learning.  Charner says “Responding to the specific and narrow needs of employers—that’s not

what education should be about” (p. 16).  Charner goes on to say “We need well educated kids who have the job skills and abilities to move in and out of different fields” (p. 17). 

Many teachers, including the author, agree that students should not be taught vendor specific skills to meet the immediate needs of today at the expense of the life long learning needs of the student.  In other words, training a student to perform particular tasks and processes should never be mistaken for a well-rounded, foundational, and developmental education.  Education promotes self-directed and life-long learning, complex thinkers, and collaborative workers.  Training creates skill patches for short term needs. 

 

Research Questions

  Only in recent years have computer technologies become critical to the successful productivity of business, education, and government.  Along with new computer technologies come the many developing companies that seek computer savvy employees to support their products. As a result, a plethora of computer vendors have developed skill-based exams, called certifications, to recognize individuals with the skills necessary to support PC’s in general and/or particular vendor products.  In fact, according

 

Information Technology 12

to Evans and Henry (2000),  “There are over 200 technical certifications available”. Certifications, called a “valuable new currency in the job market” (National

Alliance of Business, 2000, p. 3) are typically sought after by “currently employed adults looking for focused, flexible, interdisciplinary, and highly relevant educational

opportunities” (Kerka, 2000, p.1).  However, with industry not being able to meet demand with currently employed or career-changing adults, some proprietary vendors, such as Cisco, Microsoft, Sun Microsystems and Adobe have worked their curricula and certifications into the high school curriculum.  As a secondary technology education teacher, the author has had the opportunity to teach the CompTIA A+ curriculum and the Cisco Curriculum.  The author’s experiences with these curricula reflect that entry-level curriculum, for example CompTIA’s A+, are content and age appropriate, while higher level vendor proprietary curriculum, for example Cisco’s curriculum, is more appropriate for post-secondary institutions and third party trainers.  Throughout this research, the author supports this hypothesis by collecting empirical data for the support of appropriate high school IT curricula.

The following questions were of particular interest to the author and drove this study.  First, what is the success rate of high school students in northern Illinois taking the Cisco Certified Network Associate (CCNA) exam?  Second, what are Cisco Academy teachers’ perceptions of the reasons for high passing rates or low passing rates?  Third, do Cisco Academy teachers perceive the Cisco curriculum to be an appropriate IT

 

Information Technology 13

curriculum for high school students?  Fourth, do instructors believe there are other IT courses with different perceived strengths and weaknesses that may or may not be more

effective for high school students?   As a result of the collected data, this research documents the passing rates of high school students taking the Cisco Certified Network Associate (CCNA) exam, Cisco Academy teachers’ perceptions of the Cisco curriculum, and Cisco Academy teachers’ perceptions of other IT curriculum.    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Information Technology 14

 

CHAPTER 2

 

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

 

 

 

Introduction

 

            Computers have significantly changed our lives.  They make us more productive and entertain us beyond the scope of anyone’s imagination.  In a sense, computers have made our lives easier; they can balance the checkbook, move whole paragraphs within a document, manipulate large databases, and even allow us to connect to one another from across the world.  However, along with these favorable changes comes the demand for qualified persons to design, build and maintain these systems, from the stand-alone machine to the most complex computer systems. 

The change has been rapid.   For instance, only twenty-five years ago it may have seemed a bit out of place to see a computer in a classroom or at a public library.  Further, the business world depended on slide rules and calculators to crunch numbers and typewriters to print documents.  In today’s rapidly changing world of technology it seems employers want competent employees to design, build and maintain complex systems that were unheard of only recently.  How does an employer ensure the employees are competent in computer related tasks?  The answer is in professional certifications.  Certificates are a “valuable new currency in the job market” (National Alliance of Business, 2000, p. 3).   Most agree certifications prove to an employer that an employee possesses the necessary skills.  But, the age at which students begin studying for these

 

Information Technology 15

certifications is a debatable issue; an issue on which industry and education have yet to agree. 

 

Information Technology Certifications and Their Demand

            Information Technology certifications are fulfilling requirements that traditional avenues of higher education have yet to do.  The need for IT certified personnel is two-fold.  First, the American economy maintains a growing demand for IT workers in a wide range of IT occupational categories.  Second, it is alleged that the formal system of education in the United States is not producing them.  In fact, a recent report by the Information Technology Association of America (ITAA) says “The U.S. economy begins 2003 with 10.3 million IT workers, up 4.2 percent from the start of 2002”.  The report goes on to say “tech support personnel scored the largest net gains with an increase of 8.8 percent” (ITAA, 2003, pgs. 4-5).  One can see that, in view of the current employment adjustments inhibited by the recent economy, there continues to be a demand for IT employees.

According to Clifford Adelman (2000), there are other facts pertaining to IT certification in the U.S.  First, there are over 300 certifications created by corporate vendors and industry/ professional associations.  Second, by early 2000 there were over 1.6 million individuals worldwide who have earned 2.4 million IT certifications.  Third, of the IT certifications, about half have been earned outside the U.S.  Fourth, since third party trainers and testing centers do not report data on students in the postsecondary data collection of the U.S. Department of Education, there is little data on the backgrounds,

Information Technology 16

demographic characteristics and success rates of those certified.  Certificates are becoming more popular for employers and employees.  According to Bruce Keene

(2000), President and CEO of Kepner-Tregoe, Inc., employees are having difficulty keeping up with the quickly changing labor markets and supply chains.  Keene also says, “Increasingly, certificates are crucial to helping the labor market move at the speed of business” (p.4).  On the other hand, IT certificates are popular with employees as well.  According to Keene:

At the same time, workers are eager to secure good jobs and advance.  But for them, too, time is money, and they don’t want to waste time on either education or training that does not generate knowledge and skills that are directly marketable.  More and more, certificates are playing a key role in informing learners about the value of particular courses or programs in the job marketplace.  For employers, workers and educators/trainers, certificates speed up the market by clarifying supply and demand signals (p. 4). 

Further, the Prometric study writes “Particularly in a slumping IT economy, the most important benefits of certification for candidates are personal in nature.  Preparing for and achieving certification can result in a confidence boost as well as perceptions of credibility and competence among colleagues and clients” (2002, p. 2).  IT employees and employers place value on certifications; currently it is the only way to verify employees’ IT skills.

Information Technology 17

Overview of Information Technology Programs

            Novell, a computer networking company, began the IT certification trend about twelve years ago.  “Ten years ago Novell owned approximately 80 percent of the world’s

local area networking market.  Seeing a need to establish an acceptable level of competency for people who worked on its products, Novell trained and certified experts who oversee systems around the globe” (Dean, 2001, p. 24).  Novell experienced

tremendous success with their system of certifications.  Soon, other IT companies began offering certifications as well.  The certification trend was born, but really did not flourish until the technology boom of the late 1990s.  From here, school administrators and teachers began seeing a market created that high school students could help fill, and be successful.  Today, the popularity of high school IT courses has soared. 

Students in IT courses have generally two choices:  proprietary curriculum, with the two most popular being Cisco and Microsoft; or a vendor-neutral curriculum generally aligned toward the Computer Technology Industry Association, also known as CompTIA.  For the purpose of this research project the author will focus on analysis of the Cisco Academy.  According to Cisco’s website, the Networking Academy is “a comprehensive e-learning program that provides students with the Internet technology skills essential in a global economy.  The Networking Academy delivers web-based content, online assessment, student performance tracking, hands-on labs, instructor training and support, and preparation for industry standard certifications” (Cisco, 1998a).  The site continues to mention the Cisco Academies began in October 1997 in only seven

 

Information Technology 18

 

states.  Today the Academies are in all 50 states and more than 145 countries.  Collectively, there are over 260,000 students in more than 9,800 Academies.

 

 

Arguments Opposing Proprietary IT Certifications for High School Students

 

            There seems to be little debate over the need and demand for IT curriculum in today’s high schools.  The current debate of teaching IT certification coursework comes down to two questions.  First, should the course teach students material solely to pass the

exam to become certified; an intellectual, material-centered approach?  This debate is similar to teachers who dispute teaching to standardized tests.  Or, second, should the

course teach students through hands-on activities the basic principles and fundamentals of the curriculum; a building block, process-centered approach?  The author has discovered several sources that support both sides of the debate. 

First, the argument opposed to teaching high school students proprietary curriculum is best supported by the report Building a Foundation for Tomorrow:  Tech Prep Information Technology Skills Standards-Based Curriculum (1999).  This report recommends students evolve through a three-tier system.  The first tier suggests building the foundational skills (SCANS), knowledge, abilities, and personal qualities required of all workers to be successful in today’s workplace.  The second tier suggests teaching technical skills, knowledge and abilities, teaching skills common to all jobs within a career cluster across all industries.  The third tier suggests teaching industry-specific technical skills, knowledge and abilities unique to individual industries or organizations.  This model clearly suggests that proprietary curricula are classified as third tier and

Information Technology 19

should not be taught in high school until the student has successfully completed tiers one and two.  Further, in the author’s experience as a teacher, high school students do not reach tier three.  The highest tier a high school student will reach is tier two.  Thus, tier three material becomes applicable at the collegiate or industry level. 

            Bettina Lankard Brown (1999), in her work Good Work Ensures Employment Success:  Myths and Realities, also supports teaching foundational, transferable skills

before learning the technical skills of vendor specific curricula.  Brown writes, “With increased attention to skill standards and worker certifications, people tend to consider their qualifications solely in relationship to the occupational skills they have acquired.  This publication addresses the myth that skill competencies alone ensure employment

and discusses the value of continuous learning, emotional intelligence, networking, flexibility, and commitment to business objectives as other keys to workplace success” (p. 4).  Brown suggests students must learn transferable and employable skills before seeking employer specific skills like proprietary IT certifications.  

            The arguments that oppose proprietary certifications in IT classes go beyond IT issues to face the pedagogy of education as a whole.  Current political ideology suggests “No child left behind”, guaranteeing student performance and preparedness through standardized testing.  In his article titled Degrees in Thinkology, John Desmond speaks of the current unmerited philosophy of modern education.  Desmond writes “To many, this is the purpose of education – knowledge for money.  Our school administrators and politicians respond to this attitude and are now turning our public schools into test preparation centers instead of places of genuine learning”.  Desmond goes on to say “It

Information Technology 20

trivializes knowledge and eliminates the concepts of understanding and perspective.  By associating knowledge only with material gain, we create a society where we only study

to pass test” (Desmond, 2002, 7).  Although Desmond is not specifically speaking of IT curriculum, he is addressing the educational pedagogy of teaching to pass a test, otherwise known as training, which is what proprietary curriculums teach.  Instead, Desmond continues to believe schools should teach fundamental skills, thought process, self-directed learning, and developing students into life-long learners.  Vendor-neutral curriculum teaches fundamental and foundational skills that are applicable across the computer science cluster.

            Industry leaders also value the importance of vendor-neutral certifications.  CompTIA, the Computer Technology Industry Association, is the largest global trade association supporting the IT industry.  Currently, CompTIA has 9,600 corporate members and 10,500 individual professional members.  John Venator, President and CEO of CompTIA, had this to say regarding professional certifications:

Reputable educational and training organizations emphasize that students learn broad concepts first, before jumping into specifics.  They want their students to become fully grounded so that when the technology climate changes, and it always does, they will have the insights and the knowledge to adapt successfully to a new environment.  Vendor-neutral certifications are developed and maintained from this need to set standards at the foundation level.  A second group that definitely wants to see well-grounded people is comprised of employers.  Employers know that IT professionals who are well versed in the

Information Technology 21

basics respond quite effectively to additional training and are more flexible in handling a variety of situations” (Certification Magazine, 2003, p. 18).

Venator’s suggestion of students learning basic, foundational skills is in alignment with the report Building a Foundation for Tomorrow:  Tech Prep Information Technology Skills Standards-Based Curriculum (1999).  Venator’s recommendation is equivalent to the second of three tiers suggesting students should learn technical skills, knowledge and abilities, and teaching skills common to all jobs within a career cluster.  Venator believes proprietary curriculum, which focuses on product details and skills unique to a particular job, is too advanced for the beginning student and is better suited for one who already has basic foundational knowledge reinforced with personal experiences.

In August of 2001, the author submitted a letter to the editor of Certification Magazine, Mr. Steve Sosbe.  The letter was published in the October 2001 issue of Certification Magazine.  The following are excerpts of emails the author received from

readers who support vendor-neutral curriculum in high school IT coursework.  The editor of Certification Magazine, Steve Sosbe, responded with “I’d advocate pre-certification training at the high school level, and certification training at the community college level”.  Further, Sosbe writes “A certification program is only successful when it is populated by talented professionals.  Marketing certifications to unprepared people of any age is, I believe, unfair, as it provides false hopes to the person and threatens the credibility of the credential” (Sosbe, personal communication, July 23, 2001).  Sosbe suggests that teaching proprietary IT curriculums in high school not only provides false

 

Information Technology 22

hope for the students but also affects the entire IT industry as it “threatens the credibility of the credential”.  Another response to the letter to the editor came from Mr. Paul

Mackay, the Executive Director of the Metropolitan Vocational Technical Cooperative in St. Louis, Missouri.  Mr. Mackay writes:

In researching the concept we found industry experts who warned us away from Cisco.  In fact we used the CertCities website as a research vehicle interviewing twenty five of their contributing writers asking them what are the appropriate IT certifications for high school students.  The majority opinion was that A+, Net+, I-Net+, and Server+ were the best places to start with those certifications being a good foundation for proprietary certifications.  It is interesting to note that the National Academy Foundation and the Center for Occupational Research and Development in their collaboration in developing an IT academy for high school students stayed away from proprietary certifications (Mackay, personal communication, January 29, 2002). 

            Lastly, Charles Brooks of Marcraft, an industry leader in IT training and certification, also believes high school students should be introduced to IT certification through vendor-neutral curriculum.  Brooks writes:

The high school IT development program can be served much better by implementing vendor-neutral, introductory IT certification courses in a logical progression that leads to job skills and success.  The fact that these certifications deal with the fundamentals of the industry and that they lend themselves to levels that can be achieved by typical high school students is our major reason for

Information Technology 23

supporting them at the high school level (Brooks, personal communication, January 21, 2003).

Both Mackay and Brooks’ research infers many well-respected IT professionals believe vendor-neutral certifications are best suited for high school students while proprietary certifications are best suited for post-secondary students.

The literature review turned up many references in favor of teaching non-proprietary, or vendor-neutral, IT curriculum to entry-level high school students.  The most popular vendor-neutral curriculum is CompTIA’s.  In fact, the CompTIA website says, “CompTIA vendor-neutral certification programs are known throughout the technology community as one of the best ways to break into the information technology field and build a solid career”.  The site goes on to mention, “Top technology companies like Cisco, Hewlett Packard, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, and Novell use CompTIA certifications as electives or equivalents to their own certification tracks” (CompTIA, 2003a).

CompTIA’s most popular certification, the A+ Certification, with nearly 500,000 certified people worldwide, is the certification many educators turn to for vendor-neutral, foundational training.  CompTIA describes the A+ as “Those holding the A+ certification have a broad base of knowledge and competency in core hardware and operating system technologies including installation, configuration, diagnosing, preventative maintenance and basic networking” (CompTIA, 2003b).  The intent of the CompTIA’s A+ certification is to form a stable knowledge base in which all other proprietary

 

Information Technology 24

certifications can build upon.  The certification is broad in nature to ensure a complete understanding of the computer cluster as a whole, making the employee more

versatile and better able to cope with change in the workplace.

 

 Arguments in Favor of Proprietary IT Certifications for High School Students

Arguments in favor of professional certification curriculum in high schools include the following.  In the March 2000 issue of the National Alliance of Business, Phyllis Eisen, the director of the National Association of Manufacturers’ Center for Workforce Success, writes “A certification in the hand of an employee, whether of not they have a college degree, is money in the bank” (p. 4).  Further support is from a report the Wisconsin State Department of Public Instruction, Madison, wrote titled “Program Standards for Business:  What Wisconsin Students Should Know and Be Able To Do in Business”.  The report says, “A comprehensive business program must have an occupational preparation component.  Either through work-based learning experiences or school-based instruction, students should be offered the opportunity to obtain industry-standard certifications”.  Moreover, the report lists “Possible school-based offerings could include:  CCNA, CNA, MCP, MOUS, A+” (Wisconsin State Department, 2000, p. 4).   Anne Lewis, author of “College Degree Stock Tumbles”, comments on the recent Educational Testing Services (ETS) research showing for the first time young people are not getting any more education than their parents.  Lewis says, “Greater use should be made of community colleges and certificate programs, and high schools should improve

 

Information Technology 25

their programs so that all students will be employable” (Techdirections, February, 2003, p.5).  Merit is given in consideration of training students for job skills and professional

certifications.  These are thoughts that suggest high school students are fully capable of passing professional certification exams in preparation for employment. 

            Income potential is another argument for proprietary certification curriculum in high schools.  An adult with only a high school diploma earns on average $18,571 (The Mint, 2003).  On the other hand, according to a national salary survey conducted by Certification Magazine, the average salary earned by one who has a CCNA certificate is $47,946.  The study also says that although one may posses a CCNA certificate, they may also have other IT certificates that influence one’s salary (Gabelhouse, 2002, p.33).  The comparison of an untrained high school graduate to that of a high school graduate with a CCNA certification demonstrates a nearly $30,000 difference in annual pay.  However, there could also be unidentifiable variables; for instance, the Gabelhouse study does not mention what other degrees/certifications CCNA certified employees might have, which may include baccalaureate degrees and/or multiple computer certifications that would affect one’s salary.

 

Conclusion

 

            The documents cited in the literature review all provide background information on professional certifications.  None of the research the author has found to date has addressed the title of this proposed research.  However, research by the author has found supporting data for what certifications are, how they are driving employment standards

Information Technology 26

for the IT field, and support for and against teaching proprietary curricula to high school students.  Through the research completed for this project, the author provides empirical

data supporting the hypothesis that high school students are not well prepared enough to take on the challenges of proprietary curricula.  The research also documents low passing rates for proprietary certification exams.  As a result, the research provides validation for

the recommendation that high school students should take vendor-neutral courses focusing on foundational IT skills and transferable skills.  This supports the conclusion that proprietary courses are best suited for post-secondary students who already have foundational knowledge and experiences to build upon and a career niche that requires the comprehension and application of proprietary knowledge.   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Information Technology 27

 

CHAPTER 3

 

METHODOLOGY

 

Rationale of the Design

            The survey administration was a cross-sectional survey of teachers in northern Illinois.  The author believes a cross-sectional survey is most appropriate because it draws information from a selected population.  The author is interested in those opinions and perceptions of teachers who have experience with vendor specific curricula, specifically the Cisco Academy, at the high school level.  Thus, the author of the research selected the surveyed teachers based upon all the Cisco Academies in northern Illinois listed on the cisco.netacad.net website. 

 

Site Selection/Subjects

            The survey consisted of a non-random purposive selection of fifty-three teachers in northern Illinois, I-80 being the southern border, who teach the Cisco Academy.  Academies varied in size and demographics as the author surveyed city, suburban, and rural districts within the defined region.  The survey was returned by 16 teachers, a response rate of 30%.

The author conducted a non-random purposive selection to ensure data was collected from a variety of teacher demographics to maintain validity of data.  “Validity is the most important idea to consider when preparing or selecting an instrument for use.  More than anything else, researchers want the information they obtain through the use of an instrument to serve their purpose” (Fraenkel & Wallen, 2000, p. 169).  The teachers

Information Technology 28

selected to be surveyed were teachers currently teaching the Cisco Academy at their respective school. 

 

Instruments

            The author of this research collected quantitative and qualitative data.  The data collected is also classified as categorical data.  Categorical data was collected to gain broad insight into the opinions and perspectives of current Cisco Academy teachers.  Categorical data collection also allowed the surveyor to collect attitudes and perceptions of those instructors who are teaching the Cisco Academy.  The instrumentation that steered this research was a survey.  A survey is used to “describe the characteristics of a population” (Fraenkel & Wallen, 2000, p. 432).  The author collected categorical data on the opinions of teachers and the success rates of their students taking the CCNA.  Further, the data was quantified to form inferences of the researched curricula.   

Survey research contains a unit of analysis.  The unit of analysis for the survey was teachers who are involved directly with the Cisco Academy as the instructor.  The survey was cross-sectional.  In other words, a cross-sectional survey “collects information from a sample that has been drawn from a predetermined population” (Fraenkel & Wallen, 2000, p. 432).  The  survey was broken into three sections.  The first section was open-ended questions about demographic information for the teacher’s academy.  According to Fraenkel and Wallen (2000) open-ended questions allow the responder more freedom in the response; thus, giving the researcher richer feedback.

 

 

Information Technology 29

Second, the instructors answered a series of questions regarding specific statements about the Cisco Academy on a Likert scale.  Third, two more open-ended questions were asked of the instructors about their overall perceptions and attitudes of the Cisco Academy.  The survey and cover letter, which is posted in the appendices section, was developed through personal experiences by the author of the research, questioning and critiquing by graduate students in the class of which the author was a component of, and informal dialog with many other Cisco Academy teachers. 

The sites of the different Cisco Academies were selected through the “Academy Locator” utility on the cisco.netacad.net website.  The “Academy Locator”  utility allows anyone to make contact via postal mail to any of the Cisco Academies through a simple database search.        

The following tables align the questions on the survey to the four guiding research questions.

Research Question #1:  What is the success rate of high school students in northern Illinois taking the Cisco Certified Network Associate (CCNA) exam?

 

Survey Questions:

How many years has the Cisco Academy been active at your current school?

How many years have you taught the Cisco Academy at your current school?

Collectively, how many students have you had in your Cisco Academy over the years?

What is your attrition rate of students in the Cisco Academy between quarters, semesters,

      or years?  (Please circle the grading cycle used to base your decision)

Collectively, how many of your students, that you know of, have taken the CCNA exam?

Of those students who have taken the CCNA exam, how many have passed?

 

 

 

Information Technology 30

 

Research Question #2:  What are Cisco Academy teachers’ perceived reasons for high passing rates or low passing rates?

 

Survey Questions (Likert scale):

Please rate the following statements pertaining to the Cisco Academy curriculum:

1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = undecided, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree

 

Semesters One and Two of the Cisco Academy curriculum are appropriate for beginning students.

1   2   3   4   5

 

Semesters Three and Four of the Cisco Academy curriculum are appropriate for beginning students.

1   2   3   4   5

 

My students encounter difficulties with the Cisco Academy because the curriculum and assessments are Internet-based.

1   2   3   4   5

 

There is plenty of time to cover and learn the Cisco Academy material completely and thoroughly.

1   2   3   4   5

 

Students in the Cisco Academy do not have an appropriate background in computers and computer networks to gainfully develop and grow from the Cisco Academy.

1   2   3   4   5

 

Students get burned out easily with the Cisco Curriculum.

1   2   3   4   5

 

The self-paced learning method causes students to get easily bored with the highly technical nature of the curriculum.

1   2   3   4   5

 

The Cisco Academy curriculum has some minor glitches but overall my students and I feel the curriculum is fairly well developed and suitable for the average high school student

1   2   3   4   5

 

I feel the curriculum is well developed and suitable for the average high school student. 

1   2   3   4   5

 

I feel the curriculum thoroughly prepares the students to successfully pass the CCNA.

1   2   3   4   5

 

 

 

Information Technology 31

 

Research Question #3:  Do Cisco Academy teachers perceive the Cisco curriculum to be the most effective IT curriculum for high school students?

 

Survey Questions  (open-ended):

 In your opinion, what are the strengths and weaknesses of the Cisco Networking Academy?

              Strengths:

              Weaknesses:

In your opinion, what are the strengths and weaknesses of vendor-neutral IT curriculum such as CompTIA’s A+ and Network +

            Strengths:

            Weaknesses:

 

Research Question #4:  Are there other IT courses with different perceived strengths and weaknesses that may or may not be more effective for high school students?

 

Survey Questions (open-ended):

In your opinion, with all the above questions in mind, do you believe the Cisco Academy program is appropriate for high school students?  Or, should high schools be teaching vendor-neutral courses like CompTIA’s A+ and/or Net+ curriculum?  Please explain.

 

Procedure for Data Collection

            The data collection method consisted of mailed surveys to teachers.  The teachers were surveyed for results reflecting their students’ achievements and the teacher’s perceptions.  Fraenkel and Wallen (2000) mention the disadvantage of mailed surveys is they have a lower response rate.   The author believes the research is of particular interest to many of the teachers who were surveyed; thus, a higher than normal response rate (30%) was achieved. 

 

Procedure for Data Analysis

              The author of the research quantified the data into easily understandable, applicable knowledge through charts, percents, means, and common theme statements. 

Information Technology 32

Through the analysis of data, the author extracted inferences between high school students’ needs and the often-mismatched challenges of proprietary certification exams.  The research provides the evidence to administrators and teachers that high school students should be studying foundational, fundamental IT curriculum before enduring the curriculum challenges of proprietary certification exams like the Cisco Academy. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Information Technology 33

 

CHAPTER 4

 

RESULTS

 

  Introduction

  This research project was driven by four questions written to determine the perceptions of northern Illinois Cisco Academy high school teachers to infer the appropriateness of the proprietary Cisco Computer Networking Academies’ curriculum in high schools. The following four questions were written by the author of this research, with the guidance and insight of fellow graduate students in the author’s research class, and the perceived educational concerns of the author’s collegial Cisco Academy teachers.  The four questions are as follows:  What is the success rate of high school students in northern Illinois taking the Cisco Certified Network Associate (CCNA) exam?  Second, What are the Cisco Academy teachers’ perceived reasons for high passing rates or low passing rates?  Third, Do Cisco Academy teachers perceive the Cisco curriculum to be the most effective IT curriculum for high school students?  Fourth, Are there other IT courses with different perceived strengths and weaknesses that may or may not be more effective for high school students?  Fifty-three surveys were mailed, sixteen (30 %) were return.

 

Research Question One

 

The first six survey questions were open-ended questions designed to answer the first research question:  “What is the success rate of high school students in northern

 

Information Technology 34

Illinois taking the Cisco Certified Network Associate (CCNA) exam?”  The first survey question is “How many years has the Cisco Academy been active at your school?”  The mean of question one is 3.5 years and the median is four years.  The responses indicate that many of the respondents’ schools have been associated with the Cisco Academy nearly as long as the Cisco Academy’s inception.  According to the Cisco Academy website, the Cisco Academy was “Launched in October 1997 with 64 educational institutions in seven states” (Cisco, 1998b).

The second survey question is “How many years have you taught the Cisco Academy at your current school?”  The mean of question two is 2.8 years, the median is three years.  The results of question two imply that many of the Cisco Academies in northern Illinois have had at least two different teachers at the Academy. 

The third survey question is, “Collectively, how many students have you had in your Cisco Academy over the years?”  The data responses ranged from six to 260 with the mean being 119.2, the median being 120, and a collective total of 1,788 students.  The results indicate that there are on average 42.8 students attending each of the different Cisco Academies in any given year.  The mean was calculated by dividing the mean number of collective students (119.2), by the mean number of years the respondent teachers have taught (2.8) at their respective schools.  Thus, there are on average 42.8 total students enrolled each year in the responding teacher’s local Cisco Academy. 

The fourth survey question is, “What is the attrition rate of students in the Cisco Academy between quarters, semesters, or years? (Please circle the grading cycle used to base your decision).”  The data responses ranged from zero to “high attrition rate.”  The

 

Information Technology 35

responses had unquantifiable data and the lack of a common grading cycle, making responses to the question difficult at best to quantify.

The heart of the survey comes from survey question numbers five and six.  Question five asked, “Collectively, how many students that you know of have taken the Cisco Certified Network Associate (CCNA) exam?”  Only 13 of the 16 returned surveys had a response to this question.  The mean to question five is 3.15, the median is one, and the mode is zero.  The responses indicate few students, 41, have taken the CCNA exam.  That is, of the 1,788 students enrolled in Cisco Academies, only 41 went on to take the Cisco Certified Network Associate (CCNA) exam.  Therefore, only 2.3% of students enrolled in a Cisco Academy course go on to register and take the CCNA exam.  It should be noted that students do have the option of taking the CCNA exam, it is not a forced test.  In other words, a student can earn a letter grade in the course, earn the credit for graduation, and choose not to take the CCNA exam. 

Furthermore, question six asked, “Of those students who have taken the CCNA exam, how many have passed?”  The responses indicate a fewer number of students, 18,  have passed the CCNA exam. The responses ranged from one to five with the mean of two, the median of two, and a mode of one.  Thus, of the 41 students who took the CCNA, 18 passed, a 44% passing percentage.  However, the percentage of students who enroll in a Cisco Academy course, register to take the CCNA exam, and pass the CCNA exam is 1% (18 students passed the CCNA divided by 1,788 total students enrolled in a

 

Information Technology 36

Cisco Academy course).  The data clearly indicates that, for one reason or another, very few students who enroll in the Cisco Academy course will successfully pass the CCNA

exam.  The data raised questions about the impact and preparation level the Cisco Academy curriculum has on the average high school student.  However, what makes the data even more troubling is that the Cisco website states the curriculum was created to “prepare students for the Cisco Certified Network Associate (CCNA) and Cisco Certified Network Professional (CCNP) degrees” (Cisco, 1998b).  Many teachers and administrators would agree a curriculum that prepares only 1% of the enrolled students to pass the certification exam has questionable appropriateness at the high school level.  The second research question was used to determine the appropriateness of the Cisco Academy.

 

Research Question Two

 

The second research question, “What are the Cisco Academy teachers’ perceived reasons for high passing rates or low passing rates?” was addressed by ten Likert based questions.  Each question was responded to by the following Likert scale:  1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = undecided, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree. 

In response to question 1, “Semesters One and Two of the Cisco Academy curriculum are appropriate for beginning students”, the most common response was “strongly agree” (37.5%).  Most other respondents marked “disagree” (31.3 %).  The mean response was 3.7, meaning the average response “agreed” to the first question.  (See Table 1 below.) 

Information Technology 37

 

 

Table 1

 

Responses to question 1, “Semesters One and Two of the Cisco Academy curriculum are appropriate for beginning students.”

 

 


Valid            Frequency            Percent            Valid Percent            Cumulative Percent

 


2                          5                      31.3                      31.3                                31.3

3                          1                        6.3                        6.3                                37.5

4                          4                      25.0                      25.0                                62.5

5                          6                      37.5                      37.5                              100.0

Total                   16                   100.0                    100.0

Mean                  3.7

 


1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = undecided, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree

 

            In response to question 2, “Semesters Three and Four of the Cisco Academy curriculum are appropriate for beginning students”, the most common response was “agree” (38.5 Valid %).  Most other respondents marked “disagreed” or “undecided” (23.1 Valid % each).  The mean response was 2.85, translating to the average response being nearest “undecided”.  (See Table 2 below.) 

                                                           

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Information Technology 38

Table 2

Responses to question 2, “Semesters Three and Four of the Cisco Academy curriculum are appropriate for beginning students.”

 


Valid            Frequency            Percent            Valid Percent            Cumulative Percent

 


1                          2                      12.5                     15.4                                15.4

2                          3                      18.8                     23.1                                38.5

3                          3                      18.8                     23.1                                61.5

4                          5                      31.3                     38.5                              100.0

Total                  13                      81.3                   100.0

Missing Data      3                       18.8

Total                  16                     100.0

Mean of responses 2.85

 


1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = undecided, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree

           

In response to question 3, “My students encounter difficulties with the Cisco Academy because the curriculum and assessments are Internet-based”, the most common response was “strongly disagree” (37.5%).  Most other respondents marked either “undecided” or “agree” (both at 25%).  The mean for question 3 was 2.4, meaning the average response was nearest “disagree”.  (See Table 3 below.)

Table 3

Responses to question 3, “My students encounter difficulties with the Cisco Academy because the curriculum and assessments are Internet-based”.

 


Valid            Frequency            Percent            Valid Percent            Cumulative Percent

 


1                         6                      37.5                      37.5                                37.5

2                         2                      12.5                      12.5                                50.0

3                         4                      25.0                      25.0                                75.0

4                         4                      25.0                      25.0                              100.0

Total                  16                   100.0                    100.0

Mean                 2.4

 


1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = undecided, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree

 

Information Technology 39

            In response to question 4, “There is plenty of time to cover and learn the Cisco Academy material completely and thoroughly”, the most common responses were “strongly agree” and “undecided” (both at 28.6 Valid %).  Most other respondents marked “agree” (21.4 Valid  %).  The mean was 3.4, meaning the average response was closest to “undecided”.  (See Table 4 below.)

Table 4

Responses to question 4, “There is plenty of time to cover and learn the Cisco Academy material completely and thoroughly”.

 

 


Valid            Frequency            Percent            Valid Percent            Cumulative Percent

 


1                          2                      12.5                      14.3                                14.3

2                          1                        6.3                        7.1                                21.4

3                          4                      25.0                      28.6                                50.0

4                          3                      18.8                      21.4                                71.4

5                          4                      25.0                      28.6                               100.0

Total                  14                      87.5                    100.0

Missing Data       2                      12.5

Total                  16                    100.0

Mean of responses     3.4

 


1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = undecided, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree

 

 

            In response to question 5, “Students in the Cisco Academy do not have an appropriate background in computers and computer networks to gainfully develop and grow from the Cisco Academy”, the most common response was “agree” (43.8%).  Most other respondents marked “disagree” (37.5%).  The mean was 2.94, meaning the average response was “undecided”.  (See Table 5 below.)

                                                           

Information Technology 40

Table 5

Responses to question 5, “Students in the Cisco Academy do not have an appropriate background in computers and computer networks to gainfully develop and grow from the Cisco Academy”.

 

 


Valid            Frequency            Percent            Valid Percent            Cumulative Percent

 


1                          1                        6.3                        6.3                                  6.3

2                          6                      37.5                      37.5                                43.8

3                          2                      12.5                      12.5                                56.3

4                          7                      43.8                      43.8                              100.0

Total                  16                    100.0                    100.0

Mean                   2.94  

 


1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = undecided, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree

           

In response to question 6, “Students get burned out easily with the Cisco Curriculum”, the most common response was “undecided” (37.5%).  Most other respondents marked “agree” (25%).  The mean is 3.44, meaning the average response was closest to “undecided”.  (See Table 6 below.)

 

Table 6

Responses to question 6, “Students get burned out easily with the Cisco Curriculum”.

 

 


Valid            Frequency            Percent            Valid Percent            Cumulative Percent

 


2                          3                      18.8                      18.8                                18.8

3                          6                      37.5                      37.5                                56.3

4                          4                      25.0                      25.0                                81.3

5                          3                      18.8                      18.8                              100.0

Total                   16                   100.0                    100.0

Mean                    3.44

 


1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = undecided, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree

Information Technology 41

In response to question 7, “The self-paced learning method causes students to get easily bored with the highly technical nature of the curriculum”, the most common response was “strongly agree” and “disagree” (33.3%).  Most other respondents marked either “undecided” or “agree” (13.3 Valid % each).  The mean response was 3.33, meaning the average response was “undecided”.  (See Table 7 below.)

Table 7

Response to question 7, “The self-paced learning method causes students to get easily bored with the highly technical nature of the curriculum”.

 

 


Valid            Frequency            Percent            Valid Percent            Cumulative Percent

 


1                          1                        6.3                       6.7                                 6.7

2                          5                      31.3                     33.3                                40.0

3                          2                      12.5                     13.3                                53.3

4                          2                      12.5                     13.3                                66.7

5                          5                      31.3                     33.3                               100.0

Total                  15                      93.8                    100.0

Missing Data       1                        6.3

Total                  16                    100.0

Mean of respondents 3.33

 


1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = undecided, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree

 

           

In response to question 8, “The Cisco Academy curriculum has some minor glitches but overall my students and I feel the curriculum is fairly well developed and suitable for the average high school student”, the most common response was “agree” (37.5%).  Most other respondents marked “strongly agree” (25%).  The mean response was 3.56, meaning the average response was nearest “agree”.  (See Table 8 below.)

                                                           

 

Information Technology 42

Table 8

Responses to question 8, “The Cisco Academy curriculum has some minor glitches but overall my students and I feel the curriculum is fairly well developed and suitable for the average high school student”.

 


Valid            Frequency            Percent            Valid Percent            Cumulative Percent

 


1                          1                        6.3                       6.3                                 6.3

2                          3                      18.8                     18.8                               25.0

3                          2                      12.5                     12.5                               37.5

4                          6                      37.5                     37.5                               75.0

5                          4                      25.0                     25.0                             100.0

Total                  15                      93.8                   100.0

Mean                   3.56

 


1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = undecided, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree

 

           

In response to question 9, “I feel the curriculum is well developed and suitable for the average high school student”, the most common response was “agree” (50%).  Most other respondents marked “disagree” (25%).  The mean score is 3.5, meaning the average response was split evenly between “undecided” and “agree”.  (See Table 9 below.)    

Table 9

Responses to question 9, “I feel the curriculum is well developed and suitable for the average high school student”. 

 


Valid            Frequency            Percent            Valid Percent            Cumulative Percent

 


2                          4                      25.0                      25.0                                25.0

3                          2                      12.5                      12.5                                37.5

4                          8                      50.0                      50.0                                87.5

5                          2                      12.5                      12.5                              100.0

Total                   16                   100.0                    100.0

Mean                    3.5

 


1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = undecided, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree

 

            Information Technology 43

In response to question 10, “I feel the curriculum thoroughly prepares the students to successfully pass the CCNA”, the most common response was “agree” (46.7 Valid %).  Most other respondents marked “disagree” (20 Valid %).  The mean of respondents is 3.4, meaning the average response was nearest “undecided”.  (See Table 10 below.)

Table 10

Responses to question 10, “I feel the curriculum thoroughly prepares the students to successfully pass the CCNA”.

 

 


Valid            Frequency            Percent            Valid Percent            Cumulative Percent

 


1                          1                        6.3                       6.7                                6.7

2                          3                      18.8                     20.0                              26.7

3                          2                      12.5                     13.3                              40.0

4                          7                      43.8                     46.7                              86.7

5                          2                      12.5                     13.3                            100.0

Total                  15                      93.8                   100.0

Missing Data       1                        6.3

Total                  16                    100.0

Mean of respondents 3.4

 


1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = undecided, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree

 

 

Research Question Three

 

The third research question, “Do Cisco Academy teachers perceive the Cisco curriculum to be the most effective IT curriculum for high school students?”, was facilitated by two open-ended questions.  The first question was written to gauge the perceived strengths and weaknesses of the Cisco curriculum.  The second question was written to gauge the perceived strengths and weaknesses of vendor-neutral curriculum.  Vendor-neutral curriculum is curriculum not based solely on one manufacturer’s products or services; rather, vendor-neutral curriculum is based upon broad industry standards

Information Technology 44

meant to be applicable across many different Information Technology platforms and  manufacturers.  In comparing the two, the author was able to accurately determine the Cisco teachers’ perceived opinions of the most effective IT curriculum for high school students.  

The first survey question, “In your opinion, what are the strengths and weaknesses of the Cisco Academy?” had a variety of responses.  First, the teachers’ opinions in support of the strengths of the Cisco curriculum had various responses including:     “graphics”, “hands-on labs”, “quality of reading is beneficial”, “on-line approach”, “lab oriented”, “clearly written (curriculum)”, “self-paced”, “excellent curriculum”, “good preparation for the CCNA”, “for the serious networker the class works”, “current up-to-date curriculum”, “prepares students for a 21st Century career”, “plenty of hands-on activities second semester”, “test feedback”, and “name known in industry”.  The responses indicate the Cisco Academy teachers’ perceive the strengths of the curriculum to be well rounded with good intentions, online research, solid labs, and quality material.

The responding teachers also identified a variety of weaknesses within the Cisco curriculum, including the following:  “explanation of terminology”, “testing”, “need more labs in semester one”, “can’t fit it in one semester”, “Cisco needs to sell the program to the students better in the first semester course”, “CCNA does not match the current curriculum”, “Semester One, lack of hands-on”, “too technical for first exposure to networking, a good basic hardware and configuration course would be a good prerequisite”, “weak labs”, “lack of support materials”, “need prerequisite classes in

 

Information Technology 45

computer software and hardware and electronics”, need additional training in server side of networking”, “changes in curriculum too fast, too much”, “teachers are not prepared enough for the changes”, “schools don’t support the teachers enough”, “needs more resources and easier labs”, “time frame – knowledge needed to start”, “material”, “language”, “many of the labs are weak on content”, “quizzes not good enough”, and “too vendor specific, not enough general network things that students want:  wireless network for a home, networking games, and Apple vs. PC network issues”.  The responses indicate the Cisco Academy teachers’ perceive the curriculum to have several shortcomings including the need for more labs, less cognitive material, more teacher training, and a more neutral approach to the curriculum.

The second survey question, “In your opinion, what are the strengths and weaknesses of vendor-neutral IT curriculum such as CompTIA’s A+ and Network+”, had limited responses.  The strengths of vendor-neutral curriculum listed were:  “None compared to Cisco”, “vendor-neutral”, “provides basic knowledge – foundation”, “variety”, “knowledge”, “labs”, “good basic knowledge courses”, “good lead-ins for Cisco”, and “more general knowledge that students can use in a wider variety of jobs”.  The responses indicate the Cisco Academy teachers’ perceive the biggest strength of vendor-neutral curriculum to be its introduction to basic foundational knowledge that provides the necessary background for higher-level proprietary curriculum.

The weaknesses of vendor-neutral curriculum listed were “too general to be industry useful”, “not up-to-date, does not give vendor specific knowledge”, and

 

Information Technology 46

“cohesiveness”.   The responses indicate the Cisco Academy teachers’ perceive the weaknesses of vendor-neutral curriculum to be few and too general to be substantiated.

The number of responses for the second survey question was fewer than the author anticipated.  It is possible that few of the responding teachers have a working knowledge of vendor-neutral curriculum.

           

Research Question Four

 

The last research question, “Are there other IT courses with different perceived strengths and weaknesses that may or may not be more effective for high school students?” was addressed by one open-ended question.  The survey question for research question number four is “In your opinion, with all the above questions in mind, do you believe the Cisco Academy program is appropriate for high schools, or high schools should be teaching vendor-neutral/foundational courses like CompTIA’s A+ or Network+ curriculum? Please explain”.  The responses ranged from support for the Cisco Academy to responses that are in favor of vendor-neutral curriculum. 

First, the responses that are in favor of supporting the Cisco Academy at the high school level included the following:  “Cisco is a much better curriculum”, “I do think high school students have the aptitude to complete the Cisco Networking program.  They are just not accustomed to the reading required to their normal coursework.  Cisco curriculum requires students to read a lot of material which is not typical for many high school classes, more common at the university level”, “90% of industry is Cisco, so Cisco is appropriate”, “Yes, Cisco’s Academy curriculum is appropriate for high school. 

 

Information Technology 47

We require A+ first and are now using IT Essentials 1 for that purpose.  We encourage electronics before or in addition to Cisco.  We have three years of electronics classes. 

Tech Prep component provides on-the-job experiences for our students.  Cisco is very vendor specific.  We try to find local companies to give students field experience.  Our local community college provides dual credit, so our Cisco high school students can earn both high school credit and college credit for Cisco 1-4”, and “(Cisco) is high school appropriate”.  The responses indicate the many of the Cisco Academy teachers’ perceive the Cisco Academy to be appropriate for high school students.  Some respondents believe the Cisco Academy is appropriate as it is; others see the Cisco Academy appropriate with different caveats.

In comparison, the responses that are in favor of vendor-neutral curriculum at the high school level are, “I think we should be teaching CompTIA’s A+ and Net+ at this level”, and  “A+ for two semesters and Net+ for two semesters would be a much better program for high schools, I am currently looking into changing”. The responses indicate that two of the seven responding Cisco Academy teachers’ perceive vendor-neutral curriculum to be better suited for high school students.

Lastly, one response seemed to be neutral, in favor of certification in general at the high school level while not mentioning any particular certifications.  The response, “I believe certification type courses are great for high school students, but they are hard and should be weighted courses”, validates that any certification course is difficult, especially proprietary courses.  This respondent offers a unique suggestion for the IT certification courses in high schools.  The respondent suggests IT courses should be weighted much

Information Technology 48

like Advanced Placement (AP) courses are so students can increase their grade point average and also gain college credit upon passing the exam.  It seems this approach might attract more students to the IT courses, and eventually into IT careers.

 

Conclusion

 

            The collected data helps make clear inferences about the appropriateness of the Cisco Academy curriculum in high schools, as well as the appropriateness of vendor-neutral curriculum in high schools.  The following chapter will further evaluate the data collected from the surveys and the cited data from the literature review to guide the author in making the final inferences and recommendations for administrators.     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Information Technology 49

CHAPTER 5

DISCUSSION

Introduction

            The demand for technically savvy employees continues to grow as the business world relies more and more on technology.  As a result, employers and employees value professional certifications to validate knowledge and skills in the ever-changing Information Technology sector.  Two separate paths for professional IT certifications have surfaced over the past ten years, a vendor-neutral path and a proprietary, or vendor-specific, path.  At this early stage, the pervading IT curriculum seems to be the proprietary path for high school students.  The purpose of this research project is to determine the appropriateness of one particular IT curriculum, Cisco Systems, by evaluating the literature review and the perceptions of current Cisco Academy instructors in northern Illinois.

 

Analysis of Research Question One

 

            The purpose of research question one, “What is the success rate of high school students in northern Illinois taking the Cisco Certified Network Associate (CCNA) exam”, was to determine the passing rate of high school students taking the Cisco Certified Network Associate exam.  Cisco is a private corporation; they do not have to report passing percentages or other educational data to the government to be made public knowledge.  During the author’s initial research, no insightful data could be found on the

 

Information Technology 50

passing rates of high school students taking the CCNA.  The only data related to the passing rates of high school students taking the CCNA came from Cisco’s Success

Stories.  The article, titled High Number of CCNA Certifications Earned in the School District of Philadelphia, celebrates the Philadelphia Public Schools for being home to over 30 local Cisco Academies, having over 2400 students participate in the Cisco Academy program, but noted only two of those students have earned their CCNA certificate (Cisco, 2003b).  According to this data, the success rate for students passing the CCNA exam in the Philadelphia Public Schools is 0.08%.   Cisco’s “Success Story” of the Philadelphia Public Schools was the only empirical data found that exemplified passing percentages of high school students taking the CCNA. 

As a former Cisco instructor, the author of this research had the opportunity to teach the Cisco Academy curriculum to one class a year for two years, a total of about 28 students.  The research data collected in this project is consistent with the author’s experience as a teacher.  In other words, if the results from this research project are representative, northern Illinois high schools have a CCNA success rate of 1%.  The research shows that the responding teachers had a total of 1,788 students enroll in their Cisco Academies.  Of those 1,788 students, only 18 have taken and passed the CCNA exam.  One might suggest that Cisco’s intent is not to have large student success with their CCNA exam, rather their intent is to introduce students to the high tech world of computing and potential career awareness.  However, Cisco states the purpose of the CCNA curriculum is to “prepare students for the Cisco Certified Network Associate (CCNA) and Cisco Certified Network Professional (CCNP) degrees” (Cisco, 1998b). 

Information Technology 51

Cisco’s website says the curriculum is intended to prepare students for the CCNA, yet this research documents only 1% of students in a Cisco Academy course, as reported to

their instructors, go on to pass the CCNA exam.  Further, it should be noted that, according to the responding teachers, less than 3% of enrolled students in the Cisco Academy sit for the CCNA exam.  There are issues that are preventing high student success with the CCNA exam.  Some suggestions of issues could include, students do not see the importance of certification at a young age, the curriculum is too challenging, students do not have the money to pay to take the exam, or the curriculum is not preparing students well enough for the CCNA exam. 

 With only 1% of high school students passing the CCNA exam, it makes one wonder what the initial intent of the Cisco Academy was.  John Chambers, CEO of Cisco, and Mike Mertz, Cisco’s Director of Internet Learning Solutions Group, have been quoted as suggesting the Cisco Academy was designed to directly benefit Cisco financially, and not designed for the well-being of the industry through the preparation of tomorrow’s workforce.  Chambers says, “E-learning increases network traffic.  And as the CEO of a networking company, I can only be happy with that.”  Mertz says, “The first is obvious:  The more people learning online, the more networking gear Cisco can sell.”  Further, Mertz says, “It’s a fundamental strategic imperative for us to train more people to plan, design, and install the Internet infrastructure that we’re building” (Training and Development, 2001, p. 48).  Did Cisco create the Academy to help produce an abundant, well-educated workforce for tomorrow?  Or, did Cisco create the Academy to fabricate a greater demand for their product, or to market their product in front of

Information Technology 52

thousands of high school students daily?  Thousands of corporations would desire to have this kind of marketing presence in America’s high schools and across the world.  The

percentage of students passing the CCNA is questionable at best.  The success percentage implies Cisco has little interest in helping more students pass the CCNA exam, and increases the concern that, if the objective is to prepare students for professional certification, then alternative curriculums should be pursued.   

 

Analysis of Research Question Two

 

            Research question two, “What are the Cisco Academy teachers’ perceived reasons for high passing rates or low passing rates?”, was written to determine why passing rates were high or why they were low.  As the research indicates, reported passing rates on the CCNA exam are alarmingly low, but overall the responses to the survey questions do not clearly point to why the passing percentages are low.  In other words, only three of the ten survey questions had definitive responses, a response that did not have a mean of “undecided”. 

For example, responding teachers had a mean response near “agree” to question 1, “Semesters One and Two of the Cisco Academy curriculum are appropriate for beginning students.”  Respondents had a mean response of “disagree” with question 3, “My students encounter difficulties with the Cisco Academy because the curriculum and assessments are Internet-based”.  On average, the respondents “agree” with question 8, “The Cisco Academy curriculum has some minor glitches but overall my students and I feel the curriculum is fairly well developed and suitable for the average high school student”.  To summarize, the three clearest findings are as follows:  Cisco teachers agree that semesters

Information Technology 53

one and two of the Cisco Academy are appropriate; Cisco teachers disagree that students encounter difficulty with the curriculum because it is Internet based; and Cisco teachers

agree that the Cisco Academy has some minor glitches but overall the curriculum is well developed and suitable for the average high school student.  (This is not to be confused with survey question 9, “I feel the curriculum is well developed and suitable for the average high school student.)

The seven other questions have a mean response of “undecided”.  In other words, the responding teachers are undecided if semesters three and four are appropriate for high school students, and if there is plenty of time to cover and learn the Cisco Academy material completely and thoroughly.  Further, Cisco teachers are “undecided” if students in the Cisco Academy have the appropriate background in computers to gainfully grow from the Academy, if students get burned out easily with the curriculum, and if the self-paced curriculum causes the students to get bored with the highly technical nature of the curriculum.  Lastly, the responding teachers are “undecided” if the curriculum is well developed and suitable for the average high school student, and “undecided” if the curriculum thoroughly prepares students to successfully pass the CCNA exam.

The responses to research question two suggest Cisco teachers are not sure what impedes the success rate of students taking the CCNA, but that some issues or combination of issues are inhibiting. 

            First, one “undecided” response by the responding teachers that is of concern is question five, “Students in the Cisco Academy do not have an appropriate background in computers and computer networks to gainfully develop and grow from the Cisco

Information Technology 54

Academy”.  This statement continually reappears in online documents and in personal correspondence.  Cisco has offered a solution, called IT Essentials I, to schools who

choose to implement the program.  Cisco’s IT Essentials I program is not a required prerequisite to the Cisco Academy but is a welcomed series of course offerings to better prepare students before enrolling into the Cisco Academy course.  IT Essentials I is a Cisco connected curriculum that offers background courses in computing.  Background courses vary from PC hardware and software, Web Page design, JAVA programming, and network security issues, to name a few.  Some schools choose to use Cisco’s offerings while other schools choose to offer their own preparatory classes like CompTIA’s A+ and Network+ curriculums.  Jose Velazquez, a Chicago Public School teacher, chose to use the vendor-neutral preparatory classes.  Velazquez says, “The students were not ready.  They had the technology information but not the background.  They had an end-user background:  Word, Excel, and they surfed the web.  We’ve added A+ and Net+ before they begin Cisco” (Cisco, 2003a).  Schools do not have to offer these background preparatory courses, however, it is likely that students who have background knowledge in computing and computer concepts are better prepared and have higher capacities to succeed within the Cisco Academy curriculum. 

 

Analysis of Research Question Three, Part I

 

            The purpose of research question 3, “Do Cisco Academy teachers perceive the Cisco curriculum to be the most effective IT curriculum for high school students?” was

 

Information Technology 55

designed to gage the perceptions and impact of both the Cisco Academy curriculum as well as vendor-neutral curriculum.  The responses varied greatly.  The author determined there were more “weaknesses” listed than “strengths” listed for the Cisco Academy. 

The strengths and weaknesses will be analyzed and compared to those thoughts listed in the literature review.

            First, the Cisco Academy was complimented with many strengths.  Current Cisco instructors praised the curriculum with a variety of descriptions.  The curriculum was described as “clearly written”, “current-up-to-date curriculum”, “prepares students for a 21st Century career”, “lab oriented”, “test feedback”, and “name known in industry”.  The responses to the open-ended question reflect the preparedness of Cisco to produce a quality, on-line curriculum that promotes individualized learning.  The concept of online learning, with the Internet as the students’ classroom, is cutting edge and quite possibly the future of education.  However, of the sixteen returned surveys, only one responded with “good preparation for the CCNA”.  Cisco discloses on their web page the course is designed to prepare students to pass the CCNA exam. To the contrary, the research data shows the curriculum has only prepared 1% of the enrolled students to pass the CCNA exam in the sampled region.  Further, responses did not indicate high levels of actual student success at the high school level.  In fact, one respondent mentioned a strength for the Cisco Academy is, “for the serious networker, the class works”.  This response suggests a strength for the curriculum is that it only “works” for students who are “serious”, which is the first indication within the survey responses that course success (passing the CCNA exam) could be heavily influenced by the goals and future career

Information Technology 56

objectives of the student.  Therefore, this response suggests the course is only effective for those students who plan to make a career out of computer networking, leaving the exploratory students frustrated and perhaps turned-off to computer networking as a

career.  In other words, according to the publication Building a Foundation for Tomorrow:  Tech Prep Information Technology Skills Standards-Based Curriculum (1999), if one connects a “serious networker” to a student who wants to learn “industry-specific technical skills, knowledge and abilities unique to individual industries or organizations (p.12)”, then the student is a tier three learner and is best served in the post-secondary training institutions.  

            Respondents identified several weaknesses of the Cisco Academy curriculum.  Many of the responses to the open-ended question seemed to reflect a sense of instructors’ frustration with teaching the Cisco Academy curriculum.  Quantitatively, there was nearly double the number of “weaknesses” responses as compared to the number of “strengths” responses.  Several responses reflected on logistics, or, the handling of the details and resource management.  For example, responses such as “can’t fit it in one semester”, “Cisco needs to sell the program to the students better in the first semester course”, “lack of support materials”, “changes in curriculum too fast, too much”, “teachers are not prepared enough for changes”, “schools don’t support the teachers enough”, and “too vendor specific” all represent a lack of resource management and can be a source of confusion and anxiety for the teacher and students.  Any one of these, let alone all of these, can be a preparation nightmare for the teacher.  This is consistent with the concern from John Venator, who writes, “Vendor-neutral

Information Technology 57

certifications are developed and maintained from this need to set standards at the foundation level” (Certification Magazine, 2003, p. 18).  Venator suggests vendor-neutral curriculum is designed at the foundational level allowing it to be supported by more curriculum writers, creating more resources and a much more stable and predictable learning environment; as opposed to a proprietary curriculum where only one company supports the material.  Teachers, as well as students, no matter what the class, need stable curriculum, with adequate resources, teacher’s training, and administrative support.  Without these, teacher and student uncertainty can lead to anxiety, which leads to unproductivity, missed learning opportunities, and possible burn-out with the curriculum and future career opportunities.   This research confirms the thoughts of Bettina Brown, who writes, “the myth that skill competencies alone ensure employment and that the value of continuous learning, emotional intelligence, networking, flexibility, and commitment to business objectives are other keys to workplace success” (p. 4).  Thus, if the teacher and students have “changes in curriculum too fast, too much” students may get frustrated and lose interest in “continuous learning”, see no value in “flexibility”, and may squander commitment to their “objectives”. Educators need to evaluate their IT curriculum to ensure they are not offering “too much, too soon” to students.  

Another theme that arose during analysis of the returned surveys was lack of preparation or prerequisites for incoming students.  Comments on returned surveys such as “too technical for first exposure to networking, a good basic hardware and configuration course would be a good prerequisite”, “need prerequisite classes in

 

Information Technology 58

computer software and hardware and electronics”, “need additional training in server-side of networking”, “language”, and “knowledge needed to start” all indicate several

responding teachers believe students would be much better served if they had better prerequisites before entering the Cisco Academy.  This research supports Venator’s thoughts on prerequisites:  “Reputable educational and training organizations emphasize that students learn broad concepts first, before jumping into specifics” (Certification Magazine, 2003, p. 18).  Steve Sosbe, Editor of Certification Magazine, writes, “A certification program is only successful when it is populated by talented professionals.  Marketing certifications to unprepared people of any age is, I believe, unfair, as it provides false hopes to the person and threatens the credibility of the credential” (Sosbe, personal communication, July 23, 2001).  Cisco understands this educational need, and as a result, began the IT Essentials I program to help better prepare students before entering the Cisco Academy.  However, Cisco does not require the IT Essentials I program; Cisco merely recommends students have a background in computer hardware and software.  Paul Mackay, the Executive Director of the Metropolitan Vocational Technical Cooperative in St. Louis, Missouri, believes, because of his own research, all students should have a solid prerequisite background in the fundamentals.  As noted earlier Mackay (2003) writes:  “The majority opinion was that A+, Net+, I-Net+, and Server+ (vendor-neutral curriculums) were the best places to start with those certifications being a good foundation for proprietary certifications”.  Perhaps a result of this research will be the confirmation that a prerequisite course must be offered to students before entering the Cisco Academy. 

            Information Technology 59

Lastly, a theme that arose as a “weakness” from the returned surveys, and one in which the collected data supports, is “testing” and “CCNA does not match the current curriculum”.  The returned responses and the collected data suggest one possibility for the low success rate on the CCNA exam is the curriculum does not fully prepare students for the exam.  Research does not conclusively document the curriculum as the culprit, the research only suggests the curriculum could be a possible culprit.  In fact, there could be other factors for why only 1% of high school students enrolled in a Cisco Academy course pass the CCNA exam.  Some suggested factors for the low passing percentage include attrition rates (students from semesters one and two do not go on to take semesters three and four), burnout rate (students not interested in taking the exam after taking the course), and interest in only the high school credit and not the professional certification.  One industry leader, Charles Brooks of Marcraft, an IT certification and training expert, believes vendor-neutral curriculum better serves high school students because vendor-neutral curriculum addresses the above mentioned suggestions for low passing percentages.  Brooks (2003) writes:

The high school IT development program can be served much better by implementing vendor-neutral, introductory IT certification courses in a logical progression that leads to job skills and success.  The fact that these certifications deal with the fundamentals of the industry and that they lend themselves to levels that can be achieved by typical high school students is our major reason for

 

 

Information Technology 60

supporting them at the high school level (Brooks, personal communication, January 21, 2003). 

Brooks and other industry leaders, including many teachers, agree that proprietary curriculum is inappropriate and unjustified at the high school level.  As noted earlier, these views are consistent with the authors and are focused on the appropriateness and the effects of proprietary curriculum on high school students; this study is not concerned about the effects of proprietary curriculum on post-secondary students where conditions and variables are different.

 

Analysis of Research Question Three, Part II

 

            The second part of question three, “Do Cisco Academy teachers perceive the Cisco curriculum to be the most effective IT curriculum for high school students?”, focuses on teachers’ responses to vendor-neutral curriculum.  The responses to the strengths and weaknesses of the vendor-neutral curriculum were not as extensive as the responses to the Cisco strengths and weaknesses questions.  Perhaps few of the Cisco Academy instructors have working knowledge of vendor-neutral curriculum; thus, resulting in less responses on the surveys.  The strengths and weaknesses will be analyzed and compared to those thoughts listed in the literature review.

The “strengths” responses had one common theme, the benefit of students learning basic knowledge.  For example, a sampling of the responses for the strengths of vendor-neutral curriculum includes “provides basic knowledge – foundation”, “good basic knowledge course”, “good lead-ins for Cisco”, and “more knowledge that students

Information Technology 61

can use in a wider variety of jobs”.  As previously mentioned, Charles Brooks was cited as saying, “The high school IT development program can be served much better by implementing vendor-neutral, introductory IT certification courses in a logical progression that leads to job skills and success” (Brooks, personal communication, January 21, 2003).  One quarter of the returned surveys confirm what most of the literature review material cited, that vendor-neutral curriculum is best suited for high school IT programs because it teaches basic fundamental knowledge that covers a broad industry cluster. 

 

Analysis of Research Question Four

 

The purpose of research question four, “Are there other IT courses with different perceived strengths and weaknesses that may or may not be more effective for high school students?” was to have the respondents choose which curriculum type was better for high school IT students, the proprietary Cisco curriculum or vendor-neutral curriculum like CompTIA’s A+.  The open-ended question designed to answer research question 4 was, “In your opinion, with all the above questions in mind, do you believe the Cisco Academy program is appropriate for high schools, or high schools should be teaching vendor-neutral/foundational courses like CompTIA’s A+ or Network+ curriculum”?  Interestingly, a majority of the responses were more in favor of the Cisco

Academy than vendor-neutral curriculum.  These responses contrast the responses to question three referring to the strengths and weaknesses of both the Cisco curriculum and

 

Information Technology 62

vendor-neutral curriculum.  In question three, responses were given in a manner to suggest doubt and shortcomings within the Cisco curriculum, thus confirming most of the

literature review.  In question four, however, several respondents agreed that the Cisco curriculum was the most appropriate curriculum for high school students.  Fascinatingly, of the sixteen responding surveys, only seven (44%) responded to this question.  Perhaps the other nine (56%) respondents did not feel comfortable answering the question, or simply did not have an opinion on the matter. 

Five respondents think the Cisco Academy is appropriate for high school IT students.  Two respondents replied matter-of-factly writing, “Cisco is much better curriculum”, and “(Cisco) is high school appropriate”.  These two responses differ from the majority of responses expected within this study and the majority of responses for the weaknesses of the Cisco Academy.  The other three responses also think the Cisco Academy is appropriate, with one caveat.  One respondent wrote, “90% of industry is Cisco, so Cisco is good”.  This response suggests that because Cisco is an industry leader then their curriculum is appropriate for high school students.  The response also may lead one to believe that a high school student is just as well prepared to take the Cisco Academy course, as is a well-educated professional with many years of experiences looking to gain the next level of IT certification.  Another supporting response with a caveat is “I do think high school students have the aptitude to complete the Cisco Academy program…..Cisco curriculum requires students to read a lot of material which is not typical for many high school classes, more common at the university level”.  This favorable response suggests the Cisco Academy is the best choice for IT curriculum in

Information Technology 63

high schools but only if the student has the ability and time to read material that is consistent with a university level course.  One can infer this response supports the

literature review materials that suggest proprietary curriculum is not best suited for high school students because the level of training and use of in-depth knowledge is such that the average student needs to have extensive time and lab reinforcements to be successful with the curriculum.  Lastly, one particular respondent believes the Cisco Academy is appropriate for high school students but only when it is delicately balanced between the appropriate prerequisites and proper on-the-job experiences.  The respondent writes: 

Yes, Cisco’s Academy curriculum is appropriate for high school.  We require A+ first and are now using IT Essentials 1 for that purpose.  We encourage electronics before or in addition to Cisco.  We have three years of electronics classes.  Tech Prep component provides on-the-job experiences for our students.  Cisco is very vendor specific.  We try to find local companies to give students field experience.  Our local community college provides dual credit, so our Cisco high school students can earn both high school credit and college credit for Cisco 1-4.

This response demonstrates a logical sequence of events for students.  First, students must have a solid background in electronics, computer hardware and software fundamentals.  Second, it appears that students who are enrolled in the Cisco Academy are juniors or seniors, dependent upon what grade they started taking their prerequisite classes.  Third, the Cisco Academy courses are reinforced within the community with

 

Information Technology 64

real life experiences through the guidance of local businesses.  This logical transition from course to course would seem to be the best model for justifying proprietary curriculum in high school IT programs. 

Only two of the seven respondents think the vendor-neutral curriculum is more appropriate for high school students than proprietary curriculum.  “I think we should be teaching CompTIA’s A+ and Net+ at this level”, and “A+ for two semesters and Net+ for two semesters would be a much better program for high schools, I am currently looking into changing”.  These two responses agree with many of the Literature review citations and reflect the data collected from this research.  If the objective of high school IT curriculum is to form a framework for a career in IT, teach foundational career cluster IT objectives, and to foster an interest and lifelong learning in IT, then teaching a curriculum based upon these objectives is appropriate.  Earning a proprietary IT certification in high school is not realistic for most high school students because of many factors.  In fact, this

research shows that only 1% of students enrolled in a Cisco Academy do earn their CCNA certificate. 

High schools are going to help prepare the future IT workforce.  There’s appropriate curriculum to get students started with the fundamentals first and the

proprietary details second.  As a result of the collected data, the author concludes, as do many industry and educational leaders, that the appropriate high school IT curriculum is vendor-neutral curriculum.  

 

 

Information Technology 65

Conclusion

Sound educational decisions are made based upon sound educational research.  This research project’s purpose was to determine the appropriateness of the Cisco Academy curriculum in high school IT programs.  The research data was collected from

sixteen of the fifty-three mailed surveys.  The surveys were mailed to teachers in northern Illinois who are currently teaching Cisco Academy curriculum.  The research data indicates that the passing percentage of students who enroll in their local Cisco Academy and pass the CCNA exam is 1%.  The research data indicates that, as a whole, Cisco teachers are “undecided” on why the CCNA passing rate is so low.  The literature cited earlier strongly suggests that students studying high school IT curriculum are better served studying vendor-neutral curriculum than proprietary curriculum.  The open-ended survey question about the strengths and weaknesses of the Cisco curriculum shows current Cisco Academy instructors perceive the Cisco Academy to have many weaknesses and fewer strengths.  The same survey question suggests current Cisco

Academy teachers are not as knowledgeable of vendor-neutral curriculum based upon the number of perceptions listed.  Lastly, a majority of responding teachers believe the Cisco curriculum is appropriate for high school students, albeit, several responses had caveat agreements. 

As a result of the data collected, the author can make several inferences about the appropriate IT curriculum for high school students.  First, curriculum that prepares 1% of the students to pass the certification exam is not fully preparing its students for success.  Second, because curriculum is written and supported by a well-known industry

Information Technology 66

leader does not “automatically” make the curriculum appropriate for learning at every level of the sense.  Being an industry leader simply means Cisco makes good routers and hubs, not that they are experts at writing age appropriate curriculum.  Third, the literature review uncovered a strong advocation for vendor-neutral curriculum at the high school

level.  Fourth, citing the responses of the teachers to the open-ended questions, as seen in Chapter Four, the author uncovered a feeling of teacher frustration and uncertainty with the Cisco curriculum.  With all of the above inferences considered, the author of the research suggests that the proprietary Cisco IT curriculum is not best suited for high school IT curriculum.  Rather, vendor-neutral curriculum that focuses on industry standard technologies, teaches career cluster fundamentals, and encourages lifelong learning and achievement through educational opportunities is best suited for high school students studying IT curriculum. 

      

Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research

As a result of this research, many suggestions for future research were exposed.  More research questions and collected data could help better refine the strengths and weaknesses of both proprietary and vendor-neutral curriculum.  Future research might answer the following.  First, is there a correlation between students who pass the CCNA

exam who have had a prerequisite course and students who pass the CCNA exam who have not had a prerequisite course?  Second, what are the perceived reasons why 97.7% of students never go on to take the CCNA exam?  Third, what is the correlation between those students who pass the CCNA exam and either their GPA or SAT/ACT score? 

Information Technology 67

Fourth, what are the passing percentages of high school students taking vendor-neutral exams?  Lastly, what are the passing percentages of all students enrolled in a Cisco Academy either in Illinois, or across the United States?

Information Technology curriculum is relatively new to high school teachers and administrators, it has only been in high schools predominately within the past five years. 

Further research would be helpful in confirming or challenging the data collected within this research project to ensure the IT curriculum that students learn is age and material appropriate.  The IT community will only continue to grow, and a large number of those employees will get their start in high school IT classrooms.  The topic should not be taken lightly, as it could effect success rates and self-esteems, livelihoods, and the global IT economy.

 

Recommendations for Administrators

            As a result of this research the author makes the following recommendations.  First, a vendor-neutral computer foundational course such as CompTIA’s A+ must be taught (made a prerequisite) before any higher-level proprietary computer networking curriculum is taught.  Minimally, a proficiency test should be administered to students who enroll in a higher-level networking course, proprietary or not, if they do not have the prerequisite course.  Second, a vendor-neutral computer networking course, such as CompTIA’s Net+ curriculum, is much better suited for high school students and should be taught instead of the Cisco Academy for computer networking curriculum. 

 

Information Technology 68

Schools who have a local Cisco Academy have a substantial financial investment.  It is the author’s experience that Cisco Academies can cost school districts upwards of $10,000 per Cisco site in the district.  Administrators and teachers may not find it immediately feasible to drop their Cisco Academy to start a new computer networking curriculum.  Therefore, the author makes the following suggestions for schools in this situation.  First, teachers and students should approach Cisco Academy semesters one and two as an introduction to computer networking with exposure to conceptual and

foundational knowledge, laying the framework for career awareness and future growth.  In other words, at the high school level, the course should not be marketed or offered as a CCNA prep course or as job skill training.  The research shows only 1% of enrolled students will gain those two benefits.  The CCNA approach and job skills training approach are best suited for the post-secondary educational institutions that have the resources and realistic expectations for their students.  Second, when semesters one and

two of the Cisco curriculum are taught they should be implemented with robust teacher-student and student-student interactions.  Third, the curriculum should be complimented by an abundance of labs for reinforcement of highly technical material.  Fourth, semesters three and four of the Cisco Academy should not be taught at the high school level. Motivated high school students who want to make computer networking a career can easily take semesters three and four at their local community college.  The only exception to teaching Cisco semesters three and four at the high school level would be if

 

 

Information Technology 69

the course was weighted, similar to the College Board’s Advanced Placement (AP) courses and test.  Classifying the course as “weighted” attracts students who traditionally perform well in challenging, collegiate level courses.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Information Technology 70

 

REFERENCES

Adelman, Clifford (2000).  A parallel postsecondary universe:  The certification system in information technology.  Washington, DC:  Office of Educational Research and Improvement.  (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 445 246)

Brown, Bettina Lankard (1999).  Good work ensures employment success:  Myth and realities no. 2.  Washington, DC:  Office of Educational Research and Improvement.  (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 435 038)

Bushweller, Kevin (2001).  The new networkers:  the path to hot IT jobs begins in high school.  The American School Board Journal, 188, 16-19.

Cisco Systems (1998a).  Cisco networking academy overview  [On-line Brochure].  San Jose, CA:  retrieved January 4, 2003 from http://cisco.netacad.net /public/academy/ cnap_brochure_1200.pdf

            Cisco Systems (1998b).  About the networking academy [On-line].

San Jose, CA: retrieved January 4, 2003 from http://cisco.netacad.net/public/academy/ About.html

            Cisco Systems (2003a).  Digital divide best practices [On-line].  San Jose, CA:  retrieved June 19, 2003 from http://cisco.netacad.net/public/digital_divide/academy _guide/StudentsTraining.html

            Cisco Systems (2003b).  High number of CCNA certifications earned in the school district of philadelphia [On-line].  San Jose, CA:  retrieved June 19, 2003 from http://cisco.netacad.net/public/news/success_stories/Philadelphia.html

            Information Technology 71

            CompTIA (2003a).  Welcome to comptia certification [On-line].  Oakbrook Terrace, IL:  retrieved June 23, 2003 from http://www.comptia.org/certification/ /default.asp.

            CompTIA (2003b).  Welcome to comptia A+  certification [On-line].  Oakbrook Terrace, IL:  retrieved June 23, 2003 from http://www.comptia.org/certification/ adefault.asp.

Dean, Harvey (2001, October).  IT Certification:  What it is and where it’s headed.  TechDirections, 3, 24-27.

            Desmond, John (2002, November).  Degrees in Thinkology.  NEA Today, 3, 7.

Evans, Candy Duncan and Henry, Janice Schoen (2000).  Computer certification update for technical educators.  American Technical Education Association, 28, 10-12.

Fraenkel, J. and Wallen, N. (2000).  How to design and evaluate research in education (4th. Ed.).  New York, New York:  McGraw-Hill.

Galagan, Patricia (2001, February).  Mission E-Possible:  The Cisco E-Learning Story.  Training & Development, 2, 50.

Gabelhouse, Gary (2000, December).  Cert Mag’s Salary Survey.  Certification Magazine, 2, 28-35.

Gabelhouse, Gary (2002, December).  Certification, Salaries, & the IT Market.  Certification Magazine, 4, 27-34.

Information Technology Association of America (2003).  2003 Workforce Study [On-line].  Arlington, VA:  retrieved July 20, 2003 from http://www.itaa.org/workforce /studies/03execsumm.pdf.

Information Technology 72

Keene, Bruce D. (2000).  Viewpoint.  WorkAmerica, 17, 2.

Kerka, Sandra (2000).  Career certifications:  High quality and cutting edge?  Trends and issues alert no. 16.  Washinton, DC:  Office of Educational Research and Improvement.  (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 440 299)

Lewis, Anne (2003, February).  College Degree Stock Tumbles.  Techdirections, 62, 5.

            National Alliance of Business (2000).  Skills certificates signal competencies in a demand-driven economy.  Washinton, DC:  National Alliance of Business, Inc.  (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 440 243)

Northwest Center for Emerging Technologies (1999).  Tech prep information technology skill standards-based curriculum.  Bellevue, WA:  Northwest Tech Prep Consortium.  (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 447 805)

Prometric (2002).  2002 Global IT Training and Certification Study:  Shifting Values in the Journey to Certification [On-line].  Available:  http://www.prometric.com/ NR/rdonlyres/efrfbyc24yqqn36hind6gam7ri7vdagp3vli22ccp6ppts3tekpmmyqapj7gko2n3vr2bvswpzsrpsim743tu2feoce/FINALFeb21whitepaper.pdf 

Sosbe, Tim (2001, June).  Certification:  That’s the Ticket. Certification Magazine, 3, 4.

Staff (2002, April).  Q & A:  All About Lifelong Learning.  NEA Today, 20, 11.

The Mint (2003).  Learning and earning:  learning boosts earning [On-line].

Milwaukee, WI:  retrieved June 18, 2003 from http://www.themint.org/earning/ learning.php.

Information Technology 73

U.S. Department of Commerce (1998).  Very rapid increase in demand for core information technology workers projected for the 1996-2006 period.  America’s new deficit:  Update.  Washington, DC:  U.S. Department of Commerce.  (ERIC Document

Reproduction Service No. ED 448 338)

Venator, John (2003, February).  One Issue We Can All Agree On.  Certification Magazine.  5, 18.

Veneri, Carolyn M. (1998).  Here today, jobs of tomorrow:  opportunities in information technology.  Washington, DC:  U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics.  (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 439 254)

            Wisconsin State Department of Public Instruction (2000).  Program standards for business:  What Wisconsin students should know and be able to do in business.  Madison, WI:  Wisconsin State Department of Public Instruction. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED443 015) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Information Technology 74

 

Appendix A

Cover Letter

Cisco Academy Graduate Research

for Brett Thompson at

University of Illinois, Springfield

 

TO:  Cisco Academy Instructors

 

FROM:  Brett Thompson, Naperville Central High School

 

DATE:  March 12, 2003

 

RE:  Survey on Information Technology Programs 

 

            Greetings, and thank you in advance for taking the time to voluntarily respond to this very important survey regarding your Cisco Academy.  Allow me to first introduce myself.  My name is Brett Thompson, I am a graduate student at the University of Illinois, Springfield and I teach at Naperville Central High School in Naperville, IL.  I am a Technology Education teacher who is specifically interested in Information Technology (IT) curriculum.  In the past I have taught Electronics, CompTIA’s A+, and Cisco’s Networking Academy curriculum.  This research survey is interested in gathering local Cisco Academy teachers’ thoughts and perceptions of their Academy. 

            Participation in this survey is voluntary; it should only take about ten minutes to complete.  The survey will allow all of us to take a deeper look at how we are teaching IT curriculum.  The survey is not sponsored, nor has any connection whatsoever to Cisco Systems.  The research will be based in northern Illinois (I-80 and north) Cisco Academies only.  When you have completed the survey please return it in the stamped enveloped enclosed.  

            I want to keep your response anonymous. Do NOT write your name on the survey. By filling out the survey you are consenting to participate in the project. There are no negative consequences if you decide not to participate.  If you do complete the survey, please return it in the envelope provided. If you would like a copy of the results of my research or have any questions, please contact me at (630) 420-6415 or my adviser, Dr. Dan Matthews, at (217) 206-7521.

The UIS Human Subjects Review Officer has approved this project.   

Dr. Harry Berman can answer questions about your rights as a research subject. He can be reached at (217) 206-7411.  Again, thank you for your time and interest in the matter.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

 

Brett Thompson

 

Information Technology 75

Appendix B

 

Cisco Academy Survey

Graduate Research for Brett Thompson at

University of Illinois, Springfield

 

            The following is a survey to teachers in northern Illinois high schools that have taught or are teaching the Cisco Academy developed and supported by Cisco Systems in San Jose, CA.  Please answer the questions as accurately as possible as this data will be analyzed to draw inferences about the Cisco Academy from among northern Illinois’ high school Cisco Academy teachers.

 

  1. How many years has the Cisco Academy been active at your current school?

 

 

  1. How many years have you taught the Cisco Academy at your current school?

 

 

  1. Collectively, how many students have you had in your Cisco Academy over the years?

 

 

  1. What is your attrition rate of students in the Cisco Academy between quarters, semesters, or years?  (Please circle the grading cycle used to base your decision)

 

 

  1. Collectively, how many students that you know of have taken the Cisco Certified Network Associate (CCNA) exam?

 

 

  1. Of those students who have taken the CCNA exam, how many have passed?

 

 

Please rate the following statements pertaining to the Cisco Academy curriculum:

1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = undecided, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree

 

Semesters One and Two of the Cisco Academy curriculum are appropriate for beginning students.

1   2   3   4   5

Comments (Optional):

 

 

Semesters Three and Four of the Cisco Academy curriculum are appropriate for beginning students.

1   2   3   4   5

Comments (Optional):

 

 

 

Information Technology 76

 

My students encounter difficulties with the Cisco Academy because the curriculum and assessments are Internet-based.

1   2   3   4   5

Comments (Optional):

 

 

 

There is plenty of time to cover and learn the Cisco Academy material completely and thoroughly.

1   2   3   4   5

Comments (Optional):

 

 

 

Students in the Cisco Academy do not have an appropriate background in computers and computer networks to gainfully develop and grow from the Cisco Academy.

1   2   3   4   5

Comments (Optional):

 

 

 

Students get burned out easily with the Cisco Curriculum.

1   2   3   4   5

Comments (Optional):

 

 

 

The self-paced learning method causes students to get easily bored with the highly technical nature of the curriculum.

1   2   3   4   5

Comments (Optional):

 

 

The Cisco Academy curriculum has some minor glitches but overall my students and I feel the curriculum is fairly well developed and suitable for the average high school student.

1   2   3   4   5

Comments (Optional):

 

 

 

I feel the curriculum is well developed and suitable for the average high school student. 

1   2   3   4   5

Comments (Optional):

 

 

 

I feel the curriculum thoroughly prepares the students to successfully pass the CCNA.

1   2   3   4   5

Comments (Optional):

Information Technology 77

 

 

In your opinion, what are the strengths and weaknesses of the Cisco Academy?

Strengths:

 

 

Weaknesses:

 

In your opinion, what are the strengths and weaknesses of vendor-neutral IT curriculum such as CompTIA’s A+ and Network+?

            Strengths:

 

 

            Weaknesses:

 

 

 

In your opinion, with all the above questions in mind, do you believe the Cisco Academy program is appropriate for high schools, or high schools should be teaching vendor-neutral/foundational courses like CompTIA’s A+ and/or Net+ curriculum?  Please explain.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thank you for your time and effort, your honest responses are greatly appreciated. 

 

 

Brett Thompson

bthompson@ncusd203.org